Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25031557›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2014

Information-seeking behavior and the use of online resources: a snapshot of current health sciences faculty.

Sandra L De Groote, Mary Shultz, Deborah D Blecic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring PubMed as a reliable resource for scholarly communications services.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Evidence-based information needs of public health workers: a systematized review.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2017
    Review
  15. Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sandra L De Grootesgroote@uic.edu , Assistant Professor and Scholarly Communication Librarian, University Library, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801 South Morgan, Chicago, IL 60607; shultz@uic.edu , Assistant Professor and Regional Head Librarian, Library of the Health Sciences-Urbana, University of Illinois at Chicago, 506 South Mathews Urbana, IL 61801; dblecic@uic.edu , Assistant Professor and Collections Coordinator, University Library, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801 South Morgan, Chicago, IL 60607.
Mary Shultzsgroote@uic.edu , Assistant Professor and Scholarly Communication Librarian, University Library, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801 South Morgan, Chicago, IL 60607; shultz@uic.edu , Assistant Professor and Regional Head Librarian, Library of the Health Sciences-Urbana, University of Illinois at Chicago, 506 South Mathews Urbana, IL 61801; dblecic@uic.edu , Assistant Professor and Collections Coordinator, University Library, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801 South Morgan, Chicago, IL 60607.
Deborah D Blecicsgroote@uic.edu , Assistant Professor and Scholarly Communication Librarian, University Library, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801 South Morgan, Chicago, IL 60607; shultz@uic.edu , Assistant Professor and Regional Head Librarian, Library of the Health Sciences-Urbana, University of Illinois at Chicago, 506 South Mathews Urbana, IL 61801; dblecic@uic.edu , Assistant Professor and Collections Coordinator, University Library, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801 South Morgan, Chicago, IL 60607.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe research assesses the information-seeking behaviors of health sciences faculty, including their use of online databases, journals, and social media. METHODOLOGY: A survey was designed and distributed via email to 754 health sciences faculty at a large urban research university with 6 health sciences colleges.

resultsTwenty-six percent (198) of faculty responded. MEDLINE was the primary database utilized, with 78.5% respondents indicating they use the database at least once a week. Compared to MEDLINE, Google was utilized more often on a daily basis. Other databases showed much lower usage.

conclusionsLow use of online databases other than MEDLINE, link-out tools to online journals, and online social media and collaboration tools demonstrates a need for meaningful promotion of online resources and informatics literacy instruction for faculty. IMPLICATIONS: Library resources are plentiful and perhaps somewhat overwhelming. Librarians need to help faculty discover and utilize the resources and tools that libraries have to offer.

Indexed as

Computer LiteracyDatabases as TopicDatabases, BibliographicFaculty, MedicalHumansInternetLibraries, MedicalMEDLINEOnline SystemsPeriodicals as TopicUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25031557
PMCPMC4076125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.