Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25031500›Full record

ArticleJournal of basic and clinical pharmacy2014

A clinical study on drug-related problems associated with intravenous drug administration.

A Vijayakumar, E V Sharon, J Teena, S Nobil, I Nazeer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of basic and clinical pharmacy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Incidence and prevalence of intravenous medication errors in the UK: a systematic review.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Implementation of pharmacists' monitoring for intravenous drug compatibility.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pharmacists in Critical Care.Innovations in pharmacy · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A VijayakumarDrug and Poison Information Center, Department of Pharmacy Practice, KMCH College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
E V SharonDrug and Poison Information Center, Department of Pharmacy Practice, KMCH College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
J TeenaDrug and Poison Information Center, Department of Pharmacy Practice, KMCH College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
S NobilDrug and Poison Information Center, Department of Pharmacy Practice, KMCH College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
I NazeerDrug and Poison Information Center, Department of Pharmacy Practice, KMCH College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfusion therapy through intravenous (IV) access is a therapeutic option used in the treatment of many hospitalized patients. IV therapy is complex, potentially dangerous and error prone. The objectives were to ascertain the drug-related problems (DRPs) involved in IV medication administration and further to develop strategies to reduce and prevent the occurrence of DRPs during IV administration. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective observational study was carried out for a period of 4 months. Patients receiving more than two medications through IV route were included and studied.

resultsOf 110 patients, 76 (69.09%) were male and the rest were female. Nearly, half of the patients (46.3%, n = 51) were reported with DRPs. Of the 80 DRPs (72.72%) documented, 61 problems (55.4%) were seen in patients given IV medications through peripheral line. Among the DRPs majority seen were incompatibilities (40.9%, n = 45), followed by complications developed (12.7%, n = 14), errors in rate of administration (10.9%), and dilution errors (8%). To study the association of DRPs among gender, statistical analysis was performed and significant association was seen between DRPs and gender (P = 0.03).

conclusionAmong the reported DRPs, simultaneous IV administration of two incompatible drugs was the main predicament faced.

Indexed as

Drug-related problemserrorintravenous

Identifiers

PMID25031500
PMCPMC4074696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.