Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25031295›Full record

ArticleJournal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS2015

The value of losartan suppression test in the confirmatory diagnosis of primary aldosteronism in patients over 50 years old.

Chin-Chi Kuo, Poojitha Balakrishnan, Yenh-Chen Hsein, Vin-Cent Wu, Shih-Chieh Jeff Chueh, Yung-Ming Chen, Kwan-Dun Wu, Ming-Jiuh Wang, TAIPAI group

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chin-Chi KuoDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Poojitha BalakrishnanDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA.
Yenh-Chen HseinDivision of Clinical Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch, Taiwan.
Vin-Cent WuDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taiwan.
Shih-Chieh Jeff ChuehCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, USA.
Yung-Ming ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taiwan.
Kwan-Dun WuDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taiwan.
Ming-Jiuh WangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Forensic Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan canon@ntuh.gov.tw.
TAIPAI group
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

CARDIOVASCULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY INSTITUTIONAL TRAININGT32HL007024 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Elizabeth Selvin · 1985 to 2026
$17.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007024NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL7024-38
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) among the older-aged population has posed a crucial challenge. Among patients over 50 years old, this trial assessed comparability of the performance of two PA diagnostic tests: losartan and captopril suppression tests.

methodsA post-hoc subgroup analysis from a prospective cohort was conducted by the TAIPAI (Taiwan Primary Aldosteronism Investigation) group between July 2003 and July 2006. Of the 160 patients in the cohort, 60 patients over 50 years old received captopril and losartan tests to confirm PA.

resultsAmong the 60 patients over 50 years old, 31 patients had PA confirmed by standardized protocol. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for post-captopril aldosterone was significantly less than that for post-losartan plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) (0.87 vs 0.94, p=0.02). Using the aldosterone-renin ratio (ARR)>35 with PAC>10 ng/dl, the specificity was 82.76% vs 93.1% and the sensitivity was 77.42% vs 87.10% for the captopril and losartan tests, respectively. The equivalence between the two tests were confirmed by the exact McNemar's test (p=1.0).

conclusionThe losartan test showed comparable accuracy to confirm PA. Verification of this "elderly-friendly" confirmatory test will be the first step to prepare a specific diagnostic model of PA for the older-aged population.

Indexed as

AldosteroneCaptoprilDemographyFemaleHumansHyperaldosteronismHypertensionLosartanMaleMiddle AgedReninReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveAldosteroneCaptoprilLosartanReninaldosterone-renin ratiocaptoprilhypertensionlosartanplasma aldosterone concentrationplasma renin activityPrimary aldosteronism

Identifiers

PMID25031295
PMCPMC4297265
OpenAlexW2159471409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.