Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25031196›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2014

Is there a causal link between knee loading and knee osteoarthritis progression? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and randomised trials.

Marius Henriksen, Mark W Creaby, Hans Lund, Carsten Juhl, Robin Christensen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. State of the evidence.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marius HenriksenThe Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospitals Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mark W CreabySchool of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Hans LundFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Carsten JuhlFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark Department of Rheumatology and Gerontology, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Robin ChristensenThe Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospitals Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Frederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKAustralian Catholic University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe performed a systematic review, meta-analysis and assessed the evidence supporting a causal link between knee joint loading during walking and structural knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression.

designSystematic review, meta-analysis and application of Bradford Hill's considerations on causation. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, AMED, CINAHL and SportsDiscus for prospective cohort studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from 1950 through October 2013. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We selected cohort studies and RCTs in which estimates of knee joint loading during walking were used to predict structural knee OA progression assessed by X-ray or MRI. DATA ANALYSES: Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the combined OR for structural disease progression with higher baseline loading. The likelihood of a causal link between knee joint loading and OA progression was assessed from cohort studies using the Bradford Hill guidelines to derive a 0-4 causation score based on four criteria and examined for confirmation in RCTs.

resultsOf the 1078 potentially eligible articles, 5 prospective cohort studies were included. The studies included a total of 452 patients relating joint loading to disease progression over 12-72 months. There were very serious limitations associated with the methodological quality of the included studies. The combined OR for disease progression was 1.90 (95% CI 0.85 to 4.25; I(2)=77%) for each one-unit increment in baseline knee loading. The combined causation score was 0, indicating no causal association between knee loading and knee OA progression. No RCTs were found to confirm or refute the findings from the cohort studies.

conclusionsThere is very limited and low-quality evidence to support for a causal link between knee joint loading during walking and structural progression of knee OA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42012003253.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesKnee JointRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWeight-BearingDisease ProgressionHumansOsteoarthritis, KneeEPIDEMIOLOGYRHEUMATOLOGYSTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID25031196
PMCPMC4120424
OpenAlexW2157241391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.