Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25031193›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Association of socioeconomic status measured by education, and cardiovascular health: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Slavenka Janković, Dragana Stojisavljević, Janko Janković, Miloš Erić, Jelena Marinković

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Validity of self-reported educational level in the Tromsø Study.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cardiovascular health control in the family health strategy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Slavenka JankovićFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Epidemiology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dragana StojisavljevićInstitute of Public Health Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Janko JankovićFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Social Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Miloš ErićFaculty of Economics, Finance and Administration, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jelena MarinkovićFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics and Informatics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCardiovascular health (CVH) is a relatively new concept defined by the American Heart Association (AHA). The aim of the present study was to assess whether the indices of CVH were discriminators of socioeconomic status (SES) in the adult population of the Republic of Srpska (RS).

designPopulation-based cross-sectional study.

settingRS, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

participantsThe study involved 4165 adults aged ≥18 years (mean age 50.2; 54% women) who participated in the National Health Survey performed from September to November 2010 in the RS. STUDY VARIABLES: Participant's education was a proxy for SES. Potential discriminators of SES were indices of CVH presented according to AHA as: ideal health behaviours index (non-smoking, body mass index <25 kg/m(2), physical activity at goal level and healthy diet); ideal health factors index (untreated total cholesterol <200 mg/dL, untreated blood pressure <120/<80 mm Hg, untreated fasting glucose <100 mg/dL and non-smoking); and ideal CVH status (defined as all seven ideal health metrics present) versus intermediate and poor CVH status.

resultsParticipants with high educational levels had a significantly greater number of ideal CVH metrics, and ideal health factor metrics compared with those with low or medium educational level (OR 0.88 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99 and OR 0.88 95% CI 0.80 to 0.96; OR 0.81 95% CI 0.69 to 0.96 and OR 0.77 95% CI 0.68 to 0.87; respectively). The number of ideal behaviour metrics was not a discriminator of educational groups. Concerning the categories of CVH status the poor CVH was a discriminator for low and medium education compared with those with high education (OR 1.93 95% CI 1.24 to 3.01 and OR 1.54 95% CI 1.08 to 2.19, respectively).

conclusionsOur findings emphasise the large potential for preventing cardiovascular disease, showing a low proportion with a favourable CVH profile, especially among low-educated people. It is necessary to consider prevention strategies aimed at improving CVH in RS, targeting primarily low educational groups.

Indexed as

Educational StatusHealth StatusSocial ClassAdolescentAdultBosnia and HerzegovinaCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultEPIDEMIOLOGYPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID25031193
PMCPMC4120304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.