ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2014
Genetic engineering combined with random mutagenesis to enhance G418 production in Micromonospora echinospora.
Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in the biosynthesis and production optimization of gentamicin: A critical review.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025Review
- A two-component system MechNtrB/MechNtrC related to nitrogen metabolism regulation inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Engineering the methyltransferase through inactivation of the genK and genL leads to a significant increase of gentamicin C1a production in an industrial strain of Micromonospora echinospora 49-92S.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2022Article
- Exclusive Production of Gentamicin C1a fromAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Assembly of a novel biosynthetic pathway for gentamicin B production in Micromonospora echinospora.Microbial cell factories · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
G418, produced by fermentation of Micromonospora echinospora, is an aminoglycoside antibiotic commonly used in genetic selection and maintenance of eukaryotic cells. Besides G418, M. echinospora produces many G418 analogs. As a result, the G418 product always contains impurities such as gentamicin C1, C1a, C2, C2a, gentamicin A and gentamicin X2. These impurities are less potent but more toxic than G418, but the purification of G418 is difficult because it has similar properties to its impurities. G418 is an intermediate in the gentamicin biosynthesis pathway. From G418 the pathway proceeds via successive dehydrogenation and aminotransferation at the C-6' position to generate the gentamicin C complex, but genes responsible for these steps are still obscure. Through disruption of gacJ, which is deduced to encode a C-6' dehydrogenase, the biosynthetic impurities gentamicin C1, C1a, C2 and C2a were all removed, and G418 became the main product of the gacJ disruption strain. These results demonstrated that gacJ is in charge of conversion of the 6'-OH of G418 into 6'-NH2. Disruption of gacJ not only eliminates the impurities seen in the original strain but also improves G418 titers by 15-fold. G418 production was further improved by 26.6 % through traditional random mutagenesis. Through the use of combined traditional and recombinant genetic techniques, we produced a strain from which most impurities were removed and G418 production was improved by 19 fold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.