Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25030699›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2014

A cell cycle-regulated Slx4-Dpb11 complex promotes the resolution of DNA repair intermediates linked to stalled replication.

Dalia Gritenaite, Lissa N Princz, Barnabas Szakal, Susanne C S Bantele, Lina Wendeler, Sandra Schilbach, Bianca H Habermann, Joao Matos, Michael Lisby, Dana Branzei and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Checkpoint Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks.Annual review of biochemistry · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Dalia GritenaiteDNA Replication and Genome Integrity, Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;
Lissa N PrinczDNA Replication and Genome Integrity, Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;
Barnabas SzakalFondazione IFOM, Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, 20139 Milan, Italy;
Susanne C S BanteleDNA Replication and Genome Integrity, Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;
Lina WendelerDNA Replication and Genome Integrity, Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;
Sandra SchilbachDNA Replication and Genome Integrity, Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;
Bianca H HabermannComputational Biology, Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;
Joao MatosInstitute of Biochemistry, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland;
Michael LisbyDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dana BranzeiFondazione IFOM, Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, 20139 Milan, Italy;
Boris PfanderDNA Replication and Genome Integrity, Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany;
Max Planck Society · DEFIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology · ITMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DEETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key function of the cellular DNA damage response is to facilitate the bypass of replication fork-stalling DNA lesions. Template switch reactions allow such a bypass and involve the formation of DNA joint molecules (JMs) between sister chromatids. These JMs need to be resolved before cell division; however, the regulation of this process is only poorly understood. Here, we identify a regulatory mechanism in yeast that critically controls JM resolution by the Mus81-Mms4 endonuclease. Central to this regulation is a conserved complex comprising the scaffold proteins Dpb11 and Slx4 that is under stringent control. Cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of Slx4 by Cdk1 promotes the Dpb11-Slx4 interaction, while in mitosis, phosphorylation of Mms4 by Polo-like kinase Cdc5 promotes the additional association of Mus81-Mms4 with the complex, thereby promoting JM resolution. Finally, the DNA damage checkpoint counteracts Mus81-Mms4 binding to the Dpb11-Slx4 complex. Thus, Dpb11-Slx4 integrates several cellular inputs and participates in the temporal program for activation of the JM-resolving nuclease Mus81.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsDNA RepairEndodeoxyribonucleasesEnzyme ActivationMutationPhosphorylationProtein BindingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDPB11 protein, S cerevisiaeEndodeoxyribonucleasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSLX4 protein, S cerevisiaecell cycleDNA damage responsehomologous recombinationjoint molecule resolutionpost-replicative repair

Identifiers

PMID25030699
PMCPMC4102767
OpenAlexW2087798797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.