Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25030446›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Predictive energy landscapes for folding α-helical transmembrane proteins.

Bobby L Kim, Nicholas P Schafer, Peter G Wolynes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Untangling the complexity of membrane protein folding.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Topological constraints and modular structure in the folding and functional motions of GlpG, an intramembrane protease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  19. Constructing sequence-dependent protein models using coevolutionary information.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bobby L KimDepartments of Chemistry and Physics and Astronomy and the Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005.
Nicholas P SchaferDepartments of Chemistry and Physics and Astronomy and the Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005.
Peter G WolynesDepartments of Chemistry and Physics and Astronomy and the Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005 pwolynes@rice.edu.
Rice University · USCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics · US

Funding

STRUCTURE AND STABILITY OF IKB/NF-KB COMPLEXESP01GM071862 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KOMIVES, ELIZABETH A. · 2006 to 2016
$14.9M
CONCEPTUAL ASPECTS OF THE PROTEIN FOLDING PROBLEMR01GM044557 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI WOLYNES, PETER GUY · 1990 to 2018
$4.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM071862NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044557NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM44557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explore the hypothesis that the folding landscapes of membrane proteins are funneled once the proteins' topology within the membrane is established. We extend a protein folding model, the associative memory, water-mediated, structure, and energy model (AWSEM) by adding an implicit membrane potential and reoptimizing the force field to account for the differing nature of the interactions that stabilize proteins within lipid membranes, yielding a model that we call AWSEM-membrane. Once the protein topology is set in the membrane, hydrophobic attractions play a lesser role in finding the native structure, whereas polar-polar attractions are more important than for globular proteins. We examine both the quality of predictions made with AWSEM-membrane when accurate knowledge of the topology and secondary structure is available and the quality of predictions made without such knowledge, instead using bioinformatically inferred topology and secondary structure based on sequence alone. When no major errors are made by the bioinformatic methods used to assign the topology of the transmembrane helices, these two types of structure predictions yield roughly equivalent quality structures. Although the predictive energy landscape is transferable and not structure based, within the correct topological sector we find the landscape is indeed very funneled: Thermodynamic landscape analysis indicates that both the total potential energy and the contact energy decrease as native contacts are formed. Nevertheless the near symmetry of different helical packings with respect to native contact formation can result in multiple packings with nearly equal thermodynamic occupancy, especially at temperatures just below collapse.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein FoldingHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMembrane ProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryMembrane Proteinsenergy landscape theorymolecular dynamics

Identifiers

PMID25030446
PMCPMC4121805
OpenAlexW2068761843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.