Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2015
Suture anchor repair of proximal rectus femoris avulsions in elite football players.
Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proximal Rectus Femoris Avulsion Repair in a Collegiate Football Player: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Traumatic Proximal Rectus Femoris Avulsion With Recurrent Intramuscular Hematoma in a Competitive Martial Arts Athlete: A Case Report.Case reports in orthopedics · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Comparison Between Double-Row Repair and Soft Tissue Tenodesis for Treatment of Proximal Rectus Femoris Avulsions.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Management of proximal rectus femoris injuries - do we know what we're doing?: A systematic review.Biology of sport · 2023Article
- Isolated, Full-Thickness Proximal Rectus Femoris Injury in Competitive Athletes: A Systematic Review of Injury Characteristics and Return to Play.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Review
- Should proximal ruptures of the anterior rectus femoris muscle be treated surgically?Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2022Review
- Management of anterior thigh injuries in soccer players: practical guide.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2022Review
- Quantifying volume and high-speed technical actions of professional soccer players using foot-mounted inertial measurement units.PloS one · 2022Article
- The dominant leg is more likely to get injured in soccer players: systematic review and meta-analysis.Biology of sport · 2021Review
- Rehabilitation after a Complete Avulsion of the Proximal Rectus Femoris Muscle: Considerations from a Case Report.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Bicortical Titanium Tenodesis Button With Double-Row Fixation for the Treatment of Proximal Rectus Femoris Avulsion: Review of Literature and Surgical Technique.Arthroscopy techniques · 2021Article
- Operative versus conservative treatment of proximal rectus femoris avulsions: A systematic review with meta-analysis of clinical outcomes, complications and return to sports.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021Review
- The management of proximal rectus femoris avulsion injuries.EFORT open reviews · 2020Review
- Operative Treatment of Proximal Rectus Femoris Injuries in Professional Soccer Players: A Series of 19 Cases.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2018Article
- Nonoperative treatment and return to play after complete proximal adductor avulsion in high-performance athletes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report the results of suture anchor repair of proximal rectus femoris avulsions in elite football players.
methodsFour professional football players (first-team regulars of European first division football clubs) underwent suture anchor repair of complete proximal rectus femoris avulsions with significant tendon retraction. The following parameters were analysed: demographic data, mechanism of injury, type of injury, classification according to the Munich consensus statement, time between injury and surgery, time between surgery and full participation in training and availability for match and/or competition selection (return to play/RTP), and time between surgery and the comeback to the first official league match (return to competition/RTC). Radiographic evaluation was performed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained pre-operatively and at 6 and 12 weeks post-operatively. All players were followed for at least 24 months after return to play to exclude recurrence.
resultsMean age at surgery was 30 ± 2 years. All injuries occurred while kicking a ball, with the dominant leg affected in all patients. The injury was considered acute in three cases and chronic in one case. According to the Munich classification, all injures were type 4. Mean time to surgery was 60 ± 88 days (range, 8-191), mean time to RTP was 111 ± 15 days (range, 100-134), and mean time to RTC was 140 ± 23 days (range, 114-166). Follow-up MRIs demonstrated anatomically reinserted tendons with decreasing signal intensity over time in all cases. After a mean follow-up of 35 ± 6 months, all players were still competing at the same level as before the injury without re-injury.
conclusionSuture anchor repair of proximal rectus femoris avulsions allows unrestricted return to play in professional elite football players. Return to play can be expected at approximately 16 weeks post-operatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.