ArticleBMC medical research methodology2014
Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Adult and Pediatric Dentistry: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Frameworks of wavelength selection in diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for tissue differentiation in orthopedic surgery.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Using machine learning models to predict the quality of plant-based foods.Current research in food science · 2023Article
- Nerve spectroscopy: understanding peripheral nerve autofluorescence through photodynamics.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predictive Modeling of Beef Attributes Using Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry (REIMS) Data.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Autofluorescence spectroscopy for nerve-sparing laser surgery of the head and neck-the influence of laser-tissue interaction.Lasers in medical science · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, newly developed laser scalpels have multiple advantages over traditional metal scalpels. However, they lack haptic feedback. This is dangerous near e.g. nerve tissue, which has to be preserved during surgery. One solution to this problem is to train an algorithm that analyzes the reflected light spectra during surgery and can classify these spectra into different tissue types, in order to ultimately send a warning or temporarily switch off the laser when critical tissue is about to be ablated. Various machine learning algorithms are available for this task, but a detailed analysis is needed to assess the most appropriate algorithm.
methodsIn this study, a small data set is used to simulate many larger data sets according to a multivariate Gaussian distribution. Various machine learning algorithms are then trained and evaluated on these data sets. The algorithms' performance is subsequently evaluated and compared by averaged confusion matrices and ultimately by boxplots of misclassification rates. The results are validated on the smaller, experimental data set.
resultsMost classifiers have a median misclassification rate below 0.25 in the simulated data. The most notable performance was observed for the Penalized Discriminant Analysis, with a misclassifiaction rate of 0.00 in the simulated data, and an average misclassification rate of 0.02 in a 10-fold cross validation on the original data.
conclusionThe results suggest a Penalized Discriminant Analysis is the most promising approach, most probably because it considers the functional, correlated nature of the reflectance spectra.The results of this study improve the accuracy of real-time tissue discrimination and are an essential step towards improving the safety of oral laser surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.