ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2014
Study of in vitro degradation of brushite cements scaffolds.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-Term In Vitro Degradation of a High-Strength Brushite Cement in Water, PBS, and Serum Solution.BioMed research international · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An interest path to fabricate supports for tissue engineering is to foam calcium phosphate cement's pastes leading to an increase on material's total porosity and interconnectivity which facilitates cells' adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. The aim of this work is to develop scaffolds of brushite cement and to evaluate its in vitro degradation rate. Macroporosity was obtained by foaming the liquid phase with different non-ionic surfactants (Tween 80 and Lutensol ON-110). The foam stability was achieved by adding chitosan. The scaffolds were immersed in Ringers(®) solution during 7, 14, 21 and 28 days and samples' microstructure, weight loss, mechanical resistance and apparent porosity were evaluated. Both scaffolds presented interconnected macropores with sizes ranging from 100 to 360 µm and total porosities higher than 60%. These properties could facilitate cell infiltration, bone growth and vascularization. The scaffolds obtained in this work should be considered as promising materials for application in bone tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25029998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.