Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25029507›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Adherence to Internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a meta-analysis.

Wouter van Ballegooijen, Pim Cuijpers, Annemieke van Straten, Eirini Karyotaki, Gerhard Andersson, Jan H Smit, Heleen Riper

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 206 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
22.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04226742 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Crowd-Powered Web Platform for Accumulative Depression and Anxiety Plans and Treatment (ADAPT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, IrvineRan2021 to 2022Enrolled107ConditionsDepression, AnxietyArmsADAPT Platform (Treatment), ADAPT Comparison (Control)
NCT04237714 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Cultural Adaptation of the Smile is Fun Program for the Treatment of Depression in the Ecuadorian Public Health Care System: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ValenciaRan2020 to 2021Enrolled153ConditionsDepressionArmsSmiling is fun
NCT04948996 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Group Versus Individual Self-management of Depression Using a Mobile App to Increase Treatment Adherence Among Users of a University-based Helpline in the Dominican Republic.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthern Illinois UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled27ConditionsDepression Mild, Depression ModerateArmsEl Buen Consejo Móvil- Group (EBCM-G), El Buen Consejo Móvil- Individual (EBCM-I)
NCT07113548 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

PERSONAE: a Personalized Adaptation of Stepped Care Internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion of Southern DenmarkRan2025 to 2027Enrolled175ConditionsDepression - Major Depressive DisorderArmsPersonalized iCBT for depression, Standard iCBT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 422 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Wouter van BallegooijenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Centre/GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pim CuijpersDepartment of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annemieke van StratenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eirini KaryotakiDepartment of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerhard AnderssonDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan H SmitDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Centre/GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Heleen RiperDepartment of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Centre/GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany.
EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLGGZ inGeest · NLKarolinska Institutet · SEVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) is an effective and acceptable treatment for depression, especially when it includes guidance, but its treatment adherence has not yet been systematically studied. We conducted a meta-analysis, comparing the adherence to guided iCBT with the adherence to individual face-to-face CBT.

methodsStudies were selected from a database of trials that investigate treatment for adult depression (see www.evidencebasedpsychotherapies.org), updated to January 2013. We identified 24 studies describing 26 treatment conditions (14 face-to-face CBT, 12 guided iCBT), by means of these inclusion criteria: targeting depressed adults, no comorbid somatic disorder or substance abuse, community recruitment, published in the year 2000 or later. The main outcome measure was the percentage of completed sessions. We also coded the percentage of treatment completers (separately coding for 100% or at least 80% of treatment completed).

resultsWe did not find studies that compared guided iCBT and face-to-face CBT in a single trial that met our inclusion criteria. Face-to-face CBT treatments ranged from 12 to 28 sessions, guided iCBT interventions consisted of 5 to 9 sessions. Participants in face-to-face CBT completed on average 83.9% of their treatment, which did not differ significantly from participants in guided iCBT (80.8%, P  =  .59). The percentage of completers (total intervention) was significantly higher in face-to-face CBT (84.7%) than in guided iCBT (65.1%, P < .001), as was the percentage of completers of 80% or more of the intervention (face-to-face CBT: 85.2%, guided iCBT: 67.5%, P  =  .003). Non-completers of face-to-face CBT completed on average 24.5% of their treatment, while non-completers of guided iCBT completed on average 42.1% of their treatment.

conclusionWe did not find studies that compared guided iCBT and face-to-face CBT in a single trial. Adherence to guided iCBT appears to be adequate and could be equal to adherence to face-to-face CBT.

Indexed as

InternetCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionHumansPatient Compliance

Identifiers

PMID25029507
PMCPMC4100736
OpenAlexW2017517475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.