ReviewClinical obstetrics and gynecology2014
Obesity and contraception.
Review in Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of the etonogestrel subdermal implant in users with overweight and obesity: a systematic literature review.BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- Double burden of malnutrition and its associated factors among women in low and middle income countries: findings from 52 nationally representative data.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Women's health, hormonal balance, and personal autonomy.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- Contraceptive Options Following Gestational Diabetes: Current Perspectives.Open access journal of contraception · 2019Article
- Depo-Provera (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate) use after bariatric surgery.Open access journal of contraception · 2016Review
- Animal models of contraception: utility and limitations.Open access journal of contraception · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Utilizing contraception is critical in preventing unintended pregnancies among obese women. However, clinicians and obese patients may be unclear about which contraceptive methods are optimal. This review discusses the literature on any weight gain associated with contraceptive use, contraceptive efficacy among obese women, and special considerations for contraceptive method selection for women after bariatric surgery. The review also covers new findings on oral emergency contraception and obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.