ArticlePloS one2014
Communicating and dealing with uncertainty in general practice: the association with neuroticism.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: what is known about its communication, and what are the associated ethical issues?Family practice · 2021Pooled it
- Defining and Measuring Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicine: A Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Patient response to physician expressions of uncertainty: a systematic review.Irish journal of medical science · 2017Pooled it
- Managing diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: a systematic critical review.BMC family practice · 2017Pooled it
- Personality Traits and Empathy in Relation to Attitudes About Communication Between Medical Students and Patients.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Three Types of Uncertainty: A Qualitative Study of Family Medicine Residents.Family medicine · 2025Article
- Personality and interest in general practice: results from an online survey among medical students.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Personality traits predict the need for cognitive closure in advanced undergraduate medical students.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Overdiagnosis of urinary tract infections by nursing home clinicians versus a clinical guideline.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- "It's okay to not know …" a qualitative exploration of faculty approaches to working with uncertainty.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Coping With Diagnostic Uncertainty in Antibiotic Prescribing: A Latent Class Study of Primary Care Physicians in Hubei China.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Article
- Uncertainty in clinical practice - an interview study with Swedish GPs on patients with sore throat.BMC family practice · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnostic reasoning in primary care setting where presented problems and patients are mostly unselected appears as a complex process. The aim was to develop a questionnaire to describe how general practitioners (GPs) deal with uncertainty to gain more insight into the decisional process. The association of personality traits with medical decision making was investigated additionally.
methodsRaw items were identified by literature research and focus group. Items were improved by interviewing ten GPs with thinking-aloud-method. A personal case vignette related to a complex and uncertainty situation was introduced. The final questionnaire was administered to 228 GPs in Germany. Factorial validity was calculated with explorative and confirmatory factor analysis. The results of the Communicating and Dealing with Uncertainty (CoDU)-questionnaire were compared with the scales of the 'Physician Reaction to Uncertainty' (PRU) questionnaire and with the personality traits which were determined with the Big Five Inventory (BFI-K).
resultsThe items could be assigned to four scales with varying internal consistency, namely 'communicating uncertainty' (Cronbach alpha 0.79), 'diagnostic action' (0.60), 'intuition' (0.39) and 'extended social anamnesis' (0.69). Neuroticism was positively associated with all PRU scales 'anxiety due to uncertainty' (Pearson correlation 0.487), 'concerns about bad outcomes' (0.488), 'reluctance to disclose uncertainty to patients' (0.287), 'reluctance to disclose mistakes to physicians' (0.212) and negatively associated with the CoDU scale 'communicating uncertainty' (-0.242) (p<0.01 for all). 'Extraversion' (0.146; p<0.05), 'agreeableness' (0.145, p<0.05), 'conscientiousness' (0.168, p<0.05) and 'openness to experience' (0.186, p<0.01) were significantly positively associated with 'communicating uncertainty'. 'Extraversion' (0.162), 'consciousness' (0.158) and 'openness to experience' (0.155) were associated with 'extended social anamnesis' (p<0.05).
conclusionThe questionnaire allowed describing the diagnostic decision making process of general practitioners in complex situations. Personality traits are associated with diagnostic reasoning and communication with patients, which might be important for medical education and quality improvement purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.