Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25029179›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2014

Intubation in the ICU: we could improve our practice.

Audrey De Jong, Boris Jung, Samir Jaber

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02530957 (Comparison of Two Methods of Preoxygenation Before Oro Tracheal Intubation in the Hypoxemic Patient in Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02530957 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Two Methods of Preoxygenation Before Oro Tracheal Intubation in the Hypoxemic Patient in Intensive Care Unit : Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) + High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Versus NIV Alone : a Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2015 to 2016Enrolled50ConditionsIntubation IntraesophagealArmsNon invasive ventilation + High flow nasal cannula oxygen, Non invasive ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Videolaryngoscopy in critically ill patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Difficult tracheal intubation in critically ill.Journal of intensive care · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Audrey De Jong
Boris Jung
Samir Jaber

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

HumansIntensive Care UnitsIntubation, IntratrachealLaryngoscopyPositive-Pressure Respiration

Identifiers

PMID25029179
PMCPMC4057212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.