Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25028976›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Informing comprehensive HIV prevention: a situational analysis of the HIV prevention and care context, North West Province South Africa.

Sheri A Lippman, Sarah Treves-Kagan, Jennifer M Gilvydis, Evasen Naidoo, Gertrude Khumalo-Sakutukwa, Lynae Darbes, Elsie Raphela, Lebogang Ntswane, Scott Barnhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sheri A LippmanUniversity of California San Francisco, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Sarah Treves-KaganUniversity of California San Francisco, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Jennifer M GilvydisUniversity of Washington, International Training and Education Center for Health (ITECH) - South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Evasen NaidooUniversity of Washington, International Training and Education Center for Health (ITECH) - South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Gertrude Khumalo-SakutukwaUniversity of California San Francisco, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Lynae DarbesUniversity of California San Francisco, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Elsie RaphelaUniversity of Washington, International Training and Education Center for Health (ITECH) - South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Lebogang NtswaneUniversity of Washington, International Training and Education Center for Health (ITECH) - South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Scott BarnhartUniversity of Washington, International Training and Education Center for Health, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

Ujima Mentoring ProgramP30MH062246 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Sheri Ann Lippman · 2001 to 2026
$57.4M
CGH CDC HHS U2G GH000324NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062246PHS HHS 5U2GGH000324-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBuilding a successful combination prevention program requires understanding the community's local epidemiological profile, the social community norms that shape vulnerability to HIV and access to care, and the available community resources. We carried out a situational analysis in order to shape a comprehensive HIV prevention program that address local barriers to care at multiple contextual levels in the North West Province of South Africa.

methodThe situational analysis was conducted in two sub-districts in 2012 and guided by an adaptation of WHO's Strategic Approach, a predominantly qualitative method, including observation of service delivery points and in-depth interviews and focus groups with local leaders, providers, and community members, in order to recommend context-specific HIV prevention strategies. Analysis began during fieldwork with nightly discussions of findings and continued with coding original textual data from the fieldwork notebooks and a select number of recorded interviews.

resultsWe conducted over 200 individual and group interviews and gleaned four principal social barriers to HIV prevention and care, including: HIV fatalism, traditional gender norms, HIV-related stigma, and challenges with communication around HIV, all of which fuel the HIV epidemic. At the different levels of response needed to stem the epidemic, we found evidence of national policies and programs that are mitigating the social risk factors but little community-based responses that address social risk factors to HIV.

conclusionsUnderstanding social and structural barriers to care helped shape our comprehensive HIV prevention program, which address the four 'themes' identified into each component of the program. Activities are underway to engage communities, offer community-based testing in high transmission areas, community stigma reduction, and a positive health, dignity and prevention program for stigma reduction and improve communication skills. The situational analysis process successfully shaped key programmatic decisions and cultivated a deeper collaboration with local stakeholders to support program implementation.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePreventive Health ServicesProgram EvaluationSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID25028976
PMCPMC4100930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.