Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25028488›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2014

Robust synchronization of coupled circadian and cell cycle oscillators in single mammalian cells.

Jonathan Bieler, Rosamaria Cannavo, Kyle Gustafson, Cedric Gobet, David Gatfield, Felix Naef

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Potassium rhythms couple the circadian clock to the cell cycle.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Oscillator death in coupled biochemical oscillators.Mathematics of control, signals, and systems : MCSS · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan BielerThe Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rosamaria CannavoThe Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kyle GustafsonThe Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cedric GobetThe Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
David GatfieldCenter for Integrative Genomics, Génopode, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Felix NaefThe Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland felix.naef@epfl.ch.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circadian cycles and cell cycles are two fundamental periodic processes with a period in the range of 1 day. Consequently, coupling between such cycles can lead to synchronization. Here, we estimated the mutual interactions between the two oscillators by time-lapse imaging of single mammalian NIH3T3 fibroblasts during several days. The analysis of thousands of circadian cycles in dividing cells clearly indicated that both oscillators tick in a 1:1 mode-locked state, with cell divisions occurring tightly 5 h before the peak in circadian Rev-Erbα-YFP reporter expression. In principle, such synchrony may be caused by either unidirectional or bidirectional coupling. While gating of cell division by the circadian cycle has been most studied, our data combined with stochastic modeling unambiguously show that the reverse coupling is predominant in NIH3T3 cells. Moreover, temperature, genetic, and pharmacological perturbations showed that the two interacting cellular oscillators adopt a synchronized state that is highly robust over a wide range of parameters. These findings have implications for circadian function in proliferative tissues, including epidermis, immune cells, and cancer.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCircadian RhythmAdenineAnimalsCLOCK ProteinsCryptochromesMammalsMiceModels, BiologicalNIH 3T3 CellsTemperatureTime-Lapse ImagingAdenineClock protein, mouseCLOCK ProteinsCry2 protein, mouseCryptochromeslongdaysincell cyclecircadian cyclesingle cellssynchronizationtime‐lapse imaging

Identifiers

PMID25028488
PMCPMC4299496
OpenAlexW2169326906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.