Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25028456›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2014

Physicians' human papillomavirus vaccine recommendations in the context of permissive guidelines for male patients: a national study.

Teri L Malo, Anna R Giuliano, Jessica A Kahn, Gregory D Zimet, Ji-Hyun Lee, Xiuhua Zhao, Susan T Vadaparampil

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Importance of a team approach to recommending the human papillomavirus vaccination.Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Missing the Target for Routine Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Consistent and Strong Physician Recommendations Are Lacking for 11- to 12-Year-Old Males.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2016
    Article
  12. Quality of physician communication about human papillomavirus vaccine: findings from a national survey.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Teri L MaloHealth Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Anna R GiulianoDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida. Center for Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida. Department of Oncologic Science, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Jessica A KahnCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Gregory D ZimetDepartment of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Ji-Hyun LeeDepartment of Oncologic Science, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida. Biostatistics Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Xiuhua ZhaoBiostatistics Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Susan T VadaparampilHealth Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida. Center for Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida. Department of Oncologic Science, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida. susan.vadaparampil@moffitt.org.
Moffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Recommendation of HPV Vaccination among U.S. PhysiciansR01AI076440 · NIAID · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI VADAPARAMPIL, SUSAN T · 2008 to 2011
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI076440NIAID NIH HHS R01AI076440-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about physicians' human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine recommendations for males while the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' (ACIP) permissive guidelines for male vaccination were in effect. The purpose of this study was to examine and explore factors associated with U.S. physicians' HPV vaccine recommendations to early (ages 11-12), middle (13-17), and late adolescent/young adult (18-26) males.

methodsNationally representative samples of family physicians and pediatricians were selected in 2011 (n = 1,219). Physicians reported the frequency with which they recommended HPV vaccine to male patients ["always" (>75% of the time) vs. other] for each age group. Statistically significant predictors of vaccine recommendation were identified using multivariable logistic regression.

resultsThe prevalence of physicians reporting they "always" recommended HPV vaccination for males was 10.8% for ages 11 to 12, 12.9% for ages 13 to 17, and 13.2% for ages 18 to 26. Pediatrician specialty and self-reported early adoption of new vaccines were significantly associated with recommendation for all patient age groups. In addition, physician race and patient payment method were associated with physician recommendations to patients ages 11 to 12, and patient race was associated with recommendations to ages 13 to 17 and 18 to 26.

conclusionsLess than 15% of physicians surveyed reported "always" recommending HPV vaccine to male patients following national guidelines for permissive vaccination. Vaccine financing may have affected physicians' vaccine recommendations. IMPACT: If these recommendation practices continue following the ACIP's routine recommendation for males in October 2011, then interventions designed to increase recommendations should target family physicians and possibly use early adopters to encourage support of HPV vaccination guidelines.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePractice Guidelines as TopicAdolescentAdultChildData CollectionHumansMalePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPractice Patterns, Physicians'Young AdultPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25028456
PMCPMC4184998
OpenAlexW2070670674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.