ArticleParasitology research2014
Comparative studies on the proteomic expression patterns in the third- and fifth-stage larvae of Angiostrongylus cantonensis.
Article in Parasitology research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomic profiles of Lissachatina (Heterobranchia) and Pomacea (Caenogastropoda) snails infected with Angiostrongylus cantonensis using 4D label-free quantitative analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Applied Proteomics in 'One Health'.Proteomes · 2021Review
- Proteomic Insights into the Biology of the Most Important Foodborne Parasites in Europe.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Proteomic analysis of excretory-secretory products from young adults of Angiostrongylus cantonensis.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2019Article
- Perusal of parasitic nematode 'omics in the post-genomic era.Molecular and biochemical parasitology · 2017Review
- The Anisakis Transcriptome Provides a Resource for Fundamental and Applied Studies on Allergy-Causing Parasites.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiostrongylus cantonensis is an important zoonotic parasite causing eosinophilic meningitis and eosinophilic meningoencephalitis in humans. In this study, the protein expression profiles of the infective third- and pathogenic fifth-stage larvae (L3 and L5) of this parasite were compared by proteomic techniques. Isolated protein samples were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE), stained with silver nitrate, and analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Proteins from L5 were mainly at pH 5-7 and with molecular weight (MW) 40-100 kDa, whereas those from L3 were at pH 5-6 and with 5-35 kDa. Of 100 protein spots identified, 33 were from L3 whereas 67 from L5 and 63 had known identities, whereas 37 were hypothetical proteins. There were 15 spots of stress proteins, and HSP60 was the most frequently found heat stress proteins in L5. More binding and protein transport-related proteins were found in L5 including peptidylprolyl isomerase (cyclophilin)-like 2, serum albumin, preproalbumin precursor, and dilute class unconventional myosin. L3 had a higher expression of cytoskeleton and membrane proteins than L5. In addition, four protein spots were identified in the sera of the rat host by Western blot analysis. The present proteomic study revealed different protein expression profiles in L3 and L5 of A. cantonensis. These changes may reflect the development of L3 from the poikilothermic snails to L5 in the homoeothemic rats. This information may be useful for the finding of stage-specific proteins and biomarker for diagnosis of angiostrongyliasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.