Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25025532›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Population and demographic structure of Ixodes scapularis Say in the eastern United States.

Joyce M Sakamoto, Jerome Goddard, Jason L Rasgon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Semicentennial of Human Babesiosis, Nantucket Island.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Grappling with the tick microbiome.Trends in parasitology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  15. Perpetuation of Borreliae.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joyce M SakamotoDepartment of Entomology, the Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, and the Huck Institutes of The Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jerome GoddardDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, United States of America.
Jason L RasgonDepartment of Entomology, the Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, and the Huck Institutes of The Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe most significant vector of tick-borne pathogens in the United States is Ixodes scapularis Say (the blacklegged tick). Previous studies have identified significant genetic, behavioral and morphological differences between northern vs. southern populations of this tick. Because tick-borne pathogens are dependent on their vectors for transmission, a baseline understanding of the vector population structure is crucial to determining the risks and epidemiology of pathogen transmission.

methodsWe investigated population genetic variation of I. scapularis populations in the eastern United States using a multilocus approach. We sequenced and analyzed the mitochondrial COI and 16S genes and three nuclear genes (serpin2, ixoderin B and lysozyme) from wild specimens.

resultsWe identified a deep divergence (3-7%) in I. scapularis COI gene sequences from some southern specimens, suggesting we had sampled a different Ixodes species. Analysis of mitochondrial 16S rRNA sequences did not support this hypothesis and indicated that all specimens were I. scapularis. Phylogenetic analysis and analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) supported significant differences between northern vs. southern populations. Demographic analysis suggested that northern populations had experienced a bottleneck/expansion event sometime in the past, possibly associated with Pleistocene glaciation events.

conclusionsSimilar to other studies, our data support the division of northern vs. southern I. scapularis genetic lineages, likely due to differences in the demographic histories between these geographic regions. The deep divergence identified in some COI gene sequences highlights a potential hazard of relying solely on COI for species identification ("barcoding") and population genetics in this important vector arthropod.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiodiversityDNA, MitochondrialEvolution, MolecularFemaleGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGeographyHaplotypesIxodesPhylogenyPopulation DynamicsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SUnited StatesDNA, MitochondrialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25025532
PMCPMC4099084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.