Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25025086›Full record

ReviewTheScientificWorldJournal2014

The interaction of bacteria with engineered nanostructured polymeric materials: a review.

Ilaria Armentano, Carla Renata Arciola, Elena Fortunati, Davide Ferrari, Samantha Mattioli, Concetta Floriana Amoroso, Jessica Rizzo, Jose M Kenny, Marcello Imbriani, Livia Visai

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Recent Advances in the Development and Antimicrobial Applications of Metal-Phenolic Networks.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilaria ArmentanoMaterials Engineering Center, UdR INSTM, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy.
Carla Renata ArciolaResearch Unit on Implant Infections, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy ; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo 14, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Elena FortunatiMaterials Engineering Center, UdR INSTM, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy.
Davide FerrariDepartment of Bioscience, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 11/a, 43124 Parma, Italy ; Department of Occupational Medicine, Ergonomy and Disability, Nanotechnology Laboratory, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Via S. Boezio 28, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Samantha MattioliMaterials Engineering Center, UdR INSTM, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy.
Concetta Floriana AmorosoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Center for Tissue Engineering (CIT), INSTM UdR of Pavia, University of Pavia, Viale Taramelli 3/b, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Jessica RizzoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Center for Tissue Engineering (CIT), INSTM UdR of Pavia, University of Pavia, Viale Taramelli 3/b, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Jose M KennyMaterials Engineering Center, UdR INSTM, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy ; Institute of Polymer Science and Technology, CSIC Juan de la Cierva 3, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Marcello ImbrianiDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Ergonomy and Disability, Nanotechnology Laboratory, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Via S. Boezio 28, 27100 Pavia, Italy ; Department of Public Health, Experimental Medicine and Forensics, University of Pavia, Via Forlanini 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Livia VisaiDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Ergonomy and Disability, Nanotechnology Laboratory, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Via S. Boezio 28, 27100 Pavia, Italy ; Department of Molecular Medicine, Center for Tissue Engineering (CIT), INSTM UdR of Pavia, University of Pavia, Viale Taramelli 3/b, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITFondazione Salvatore Maugeri · ITIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITNational Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In spite of great advances in biomaterials research and development, a significant proportion of medical devices undergo bacterial colonization and become the target of an implant-related infection. We present a review of the two major classes of antibacterial nanostructured materials: polymeric nanocomposites and surface-engineered materials. The paper describes antibacterial effects due to the induced material properties, along with the principles of bacterial adhesion and the biofilm formation process. Methods for antimicrobial modifications of polymers using a nanocomposite approach as well as surface modification procedures are surveyed and discussed, followed by a concise examination of techniques used in estimating bacteria/material interactions. Finally, we present an outline of future sceneries and perspectives on antibacterial applications of nanostructured materials to resist or counteract implant infections.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacteriaBacterial AdhesionBiofilmsNanocompositesPolymersAnti-Infective AgentsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID25025086
PMCPMC4084677
OpenAlexW2074426728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.