Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25025037›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Comparison of two assays to determine anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis in relation to other chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases: assaying anti-modified citrullinated vimentin antibodies adds value to second-generation anti-citrullinated cyclic peptides testing.

Miriam Lizette Díaz-Toscano, Eva Maria Olivas-Flores, Soraya Amali Zavaleta-Muñiz, Jorge Ivan Gamez-Nava, Ernesto German Cardona-Muñoz, Manuel Ponce-Guarneros, Uriel Castro-Contreras, Arnulfo Nava, Mario Salazar-Paramo, Alfredo Celis and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Miriam Lizette Díaz-ToscanoProgramas de Doctorado en Farmacología y en Ciencias Biomédicas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico.
Eva Maria Olivas-FloresHospital General Regional 180 IMSS Tlajomulco, JAL, Mexico.
Soraya Amali Zavaleta-MuñizProgramas de Doctorado en Farmacología y en Ciencias Biomédicas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico.
Jorge Ivan Gamez-NavaUnidad de Investigación en Epidemiología Clínica y División de Investigación en Salud, UMAE, Hospital de Especialidades (HE), Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente (CMNO), IMSS, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico ; Programa de Doctorado en Salud Púbica CUCS, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico.
Ernesto German Cardona-MuñozDepartamento de Fisiologia, CUCS, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico.
Manuel Ponce-GuarnerosProgramas de Doctorado en Farmacología y en Ciencias Biomédicas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico.
Uriel Castro-ContrerasPrograma de Servicio Social en Investigación, Secretaria de Salud, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico.
Arnulfo NavaUnidad de Investigación en Epidemiología Clínica y División de Investigación en Salud, UMAE, Hospital de Especialidades (HE), Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente (CMNO), IMSS, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico ; Decanato Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Mexico.
Mario Salazar-ParamoUnidad de Investigación en Epidemiología Clínica y División de Investigación en Salud, UMAE, Hospital de Especialidades (HE), Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente (CMNO), IMSS, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico ; Departamento de Fisiologia, CUCS, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico.
Alfredo CelisDirección de la División de Disciplinas para el Desarrollo, Promoción y Preservación de la Salud, CUCS, Universidad de Guadalajara, Mexico.
Nicte Selene Fajardo-RobledoProgramas de Doctorado en Farmacología y en Ciencias Biomédicas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud (CUCS), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico.
Esther Guadalupe Corona-SanchezDepartamento de Fisiologia, CUCS, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico.
Laura Gonzalez-LopezPrograma de Doctorado en Salud Púbica CUCS, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico ; Departamento de Medicina Interna-Reumatología, Hospital General Regional 110, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico ; Avenida Salto del Agua 2192, Colonia Jardines del Country, Guadalajara, Mexico.
Universidad de Guadalajara · MXHospital de Especialidades · MXInstitute for Social Security and Services for State Workers · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MXSecretaria de Salud · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Guadalajara · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determination of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) plays a relevant role in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To date, it is still unclear if the use of several tests for these autoantibodies in the same patient offers additional value as compared to performing only one test. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of using two assays for ACPA: second-generation anti-citrullinated cyclic peptides antibodies (anti-CCP2) and anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin (anti-MCV) antibodies for the diagnosis of RA. We compared three groups: RA (n = 142), chronic inflammatory disease (CIRD, n = 86), and clinically healthy subjects (CHS, n = 56) to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios (LR) of these two assays for the presence of RA. A lower frequency of positivity for anti-CCP2 was found in RA (66.2%) as compared with anti-MCV (81.0%). When comparing RA versus other CIRD, sensitivity increased when both assays were performed. This strategy of testing both assays had high specificity and LR+. We conclude that adding the assay of anti-MCV antibodies to the determination of anti-CCP2 increases the sensitivity for detecting seropositive RA. Therefore, we propose the use of both assays in the initial screening of RA in longitudinal studies, including early onset of undifferentiated arthritis.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodiesArthritis, RheumatoidCitrullineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptides, CyclicRheumatic FeverVimentinAntibodiesCitrullinePeptides, CyclicVimentin

Identifiers

PMID25025037
PMCPMC4082878
OpenAlexW2042009497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.