Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25024701›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2014

A modified technique reduced operative time of laparoendoscopic rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for concomitant gallstone and common bile ductal stone.

Wei Liu, Qunwei Wang, Jing Xiao, Liying Zhao, Jiangsheng Huang, Zhaohui Tan, Pengfei Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05542784 (Modified Laparoendoscopic Rendezvous for Secondary Choledocholithiasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05542784 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Modified Laparoendoscopic Rendezvous for Secondary Choledocholithiasis: a Nonrandomized Controlled Clinical Study

TypeobservationalSponsorShenzhen Second People's HospitalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsCholedocholithiasisArmsModified LERV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei LiuMinimal Invasive Surgery Center, Department of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha City, Hunan Province 410011, China.
Qunwei WangMinimal Invasive Surgery Center, Department of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha City, Hunan Province 410011, China.
Jing XiaoMinimal Invasive Surgery Center, Department of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha City, Hunan Province 410011, China.
Liying ZhaoMinimal Invasive Surgery Center, Department of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha City, Hunan Province 410011, China.
Jiangsheng HuangMinimal Invasive Surgery Center, Department of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha City, Hunan Province 410011, China.
Zhaohui TanMinimal Invasive Surgery Center, Department of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha City, Hunan Province 410011, China.
Pengfei LiMinimal Invasive Surgery Center, Department of General Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha City, Hunan Province 410011, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoendoscopic rendezvous (LERV) endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC+ERCP/LERV) are considered an optimal approach for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones. The rendezvous technique is essential for the success of procedure. We applied two different LERV techniques, traditional technique and modified technique, in 60 consecutive cases from January 2011 to November 2012. 32 cases who underwent modified technique (group 1) from February 2012 to November 2012 were retrospectively compared to 28 cases (group 2) who underwent traditional technique from January 2011 to January 2012. There was no significant difference between two groups with respect to preoperative demographic features. Although the difference was not statistically significant, the procedure was successfully performed in 31 cases (96.9%) in group 1 and 24 cases (86.2%) in group 2. The mean operative time and time of endoscopic part were 82.6 ± 19.6 min and 26.5 ± 5.99 min in group 1 which were significantly shorter than those in group 2 (118.0 ± 23.1 min and 58.7 ± 13.3 min, resp.). There was no postoperative pancreatitis and mortality in both groups. The mean hospital stay, blood loss, incidence of complications, and residual stone were of no difference in both groups. This study proved that this modified technique can effectively reduce the operative time and time of endoscopic part of LC+ERCP/LERV compared with traditional technique.

Identifiers

PMID25024701
PMCPMC4082838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.