Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25024672›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2014

Standard dose development for medications commonly used in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Christine A Robinson, Anita Siu, Rachel Meyers, Ben H Lee, Jared Cash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Accuracy of intravenous and enteral preparations involving small volumes for paediatric use: a review.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence of Unrounded Medication Doses and Associated Factors Among Hospitalized Pediatric Patients.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine A RobinsonErnest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey ; Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey.
Anita SiuErnest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey ; Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, New Jersey.
Rachel MeyersErnest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey ; Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey.
Ben H LeeMorristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey.
Jared CashPrimary Children's Hospital (Intermountain Healthcare), Salt Lake City, Utah.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo establish standardized, rounded doses of medications for neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) through a multi-institutional peer-reviewed process.

methodsPediatric faculty and pediatric pharmacy residents from the Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy (Piscataway, NJ) conducted a systematic review of rounded, weight-based medication information for neonatal patients from September 2010 to April 2011. After initial review, an expanded workgroup of expert neonatal pharmacy clinicians from academic institutions throughout the United States were invited to conduct a final review. The workgroup identified 74 medications or indications in the NICU. Recommended standardized doses were established for discrete weight categories at workgroup consensus web meetings conducted from June to December 2011. Workgroup recommendations were cross-referenced with published neonatal pharmacology resources. Consensus was obtained when references provided insufficient information on medication information.

resultsSeventeen weight categories of increasing ranges were used, from 40 g for the lowest weights (e.g., 410-450 g) to 840 g for the highest weights (e.g., 3660-4500 g). Medications were divided into 3 categories of administration routes: oral (n = 4), intermittent intravenous (n = 64), and other (e.g., intramuscular; n=6). A significant majority of standardized doses (84%) were within 15% of their corresponding weight-calculated dose.

conclusionsEstablishment of a portfolio of standardized, rounded doses of medications commonly used in the NICU was feasibly established by a multi-institutional peer review process, with the great majority of standardized doses being within clinically acceptable ranges of administration. Use of standardized, rounded doses for reduction in dosing errors may be feasible on a systematic level.

Indexed as

dose bandingdose roundingmedicationsneonatepretermrounding tolerancestandardization

Identifiers

PMID25024672
PMCPMC4093664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.