B-type natriuretic peptides and mortality after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The predictive value of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement via ultrasound for intracerebral hemorrhage complicated by cerebral-cardiac syndrome.BMC neurology · 2025
   Article
2. Higher NT-proBNP Levels are Related to Poor Functional Outcome and Pneumonia in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients.Current neurovascular research · 2022
   Article
3. Plasma Interleukin-37 is Elevated in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients and Probably Associated With 3-month Functional Prognosis.Clinical interventions in aging · 2020
   Article
4. Heads and Tails of Natriuretic Peptides: Neuroprotective Role of Brain Natriuretic Peptide.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  B-type natriuretic peptides and mortality after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2013

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as