Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25024246›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2014

Validating the 8 CPCSSN case definitions for chronic disease surveillance in a primary care database of electronic health records.

Tyler Williamson, Michael E Green, Richard Birtwhistle, Shahriar Khan, Stephanie Garies, Sabrina T Wong, Nandini Natarajan, Donna Manca, Neil Drummond

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03689049 (SPIDER), which is not on this map. Cited by 151 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03689049 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

SPIDER: A Structured Process Informed by Data, Evidence and Research - A Research and Quality Improvement Collaboration Supporting Practices in Improving Care for Complex Elderly Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Toronto Practice Based Research NetworkRan2018 to 2027Enrolled104ConditionsPolypharmacy, Inappropriate Prescribing, Aged, Primary Health CareArmsSPIDER, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Validation of an Algorithm to Identify End-Stage Kidney Disease in Electronic Health Records Data.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tyler WilliamsonDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada tylerw@cpcssn.org.
Michael E GreenDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Richard BirtwhistleDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Shahriar KhanDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie GariesDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sabrina T WongSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Nandini NatarajanDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Donna MancaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
Neil DrummondDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) is Canada's first national chronic disease surveillance system based on electronic health record (EHR) data. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate case definitions and case-finding algorithms used to identify 8 common chronic conditions in primary care: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, depression, diabetes, hypertension, osteoarthritis, parkinsonism, and epilepsy.

methodsUsing a cross-sectional data validation study design, regional and local CPCSSN networks from British Columbia, Alberta (2), Ontario, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland participated in validating EHR case-finding algorithms. A random sample of EHR charts were reviewed, oversampling for patients older than 60 years and for those with epilepsy or parkinsonism. Charts were reviewed by trained research assistants and residents who were blinded to the algorithmic diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPVs, NPVs) were calculated.

resultsWe obtained data from 1,920 charts from 4 different EHR systems (Wolf, Med Access, Nightingale, and PS Suite). For the total sample, sensitivity ranged from 78% (osteoarthritis) to more than 95% (diabetes, epilepsy, and parkinsonism); specificity was greater than 94% for all diseases; PPV ranged from 72% (dementia) to 93% (hypertension); NPV ranged from 86% (hypertension) to greater than 99% (diabetes, dementia, epilepsy, and parkinsonism).

conclusionsThe CPCSSN diagnostic algorithms showed excellent sensitivity and specificity for hypertension, diabetes, epilepsy, and parkinsonism and acceptable values for the other conditions. CPCSSN data are appropriate for use in public health surveillance, primary care, and health services research, as well as to inform policy for these diseases.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSentinel SurveillanceAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualDementiaDepressionDiabetes MellitusElectronic Health RecordsEpilepsyFemaleHumansHypertensionchronic diseaseelectronic health recordsprimary health caresensitivity and specificityvalidation studies

Identifiers

PMID25024246
PMCPMC4096475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.