Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25024240›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2014

Influence of shared medical appointments on patient satisfaction: a retrospective 3-year study.

Leonie Heyworth, Ronen Rozenblum, James F Burgess, Errol Baker, Mark Meterko, Debra Prescott, Zeev Neuwirth, Steven R Simon

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03793673 (CoYoT1 to California - Telemedicine to Engage Young Adults With Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03793673 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

CoYoT1 to California - Telemedicine to Engage Young Adults With Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital Los AngelesRan2019 to 2022Enrolled82ConditionsType 1 Diabetes MellitusArmsCoYoT1 Care, Standard Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Acceptability of Group Visits for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Pediatric Clinics.Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP · 2017
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient Perspectives on Lifestyle Medicine Virtual Group Visits.American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Team Clinic: Group Approach to Care of Early Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leonie HeyworthVeterans Administration Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts lheyworth@gmail.com.
Ronen RozenblumDivision of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
James F BurgessVeterans Administration Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts.
Errol BakerVeterans Administration Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts.
Mark MeterkoVeterans Administration Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts.
Debra PrescottHarvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Newton, Massachusetts.
Zeev NeuwirthCarolinas Healthcare, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Steven R SimonVeterans Administration Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

PHS HHS T32 HP10251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeShared medical appointments (SMAs) are becoming popular, but little is known about their association with patient experience in primary care. We performed an exploratory analysis examining overall satisfaction and patient-centered care experiences across key domains of the patient-centered medical home among patients attending SMAs vs usual care appointments.

methodsWe undertook a cross-sectional study using a mailed questionnaire measuring levels of patient satisfaction and other indicators of patient-centered care among 921 SMA and 921 usual care patients between 2008 and 2010. Propensity scores adjusted for potential case mix differences between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression assessed propensity-matched patients' ratings of care. Generalized estimating equations accounted for physician-level clustering.

resultsA total of 40% of SMA patients and 31% of usual care patients responded. In adjusted analyses, SMA patients were more likely to rate their overall satisfaction with care as "very good" when compared with usual care counterparts (odds ratio=1.26; 95% CI, 1.05-1.52). In the analysis of patient-centered medical home elements, SMA patients rated their care as more accessible and more sensitive to their needs, whereas usual care patients reported greater satisfaction with physician communication and time spent during their appointment.

conclusionsOverall, SMA patients appear more satisfied with their care relative to patients receiving usual care. SMAs may also improve access to care and deliver care that patients find to be sensitive to their needs. Further research should focus on enhancing patient-clinician communication within an SMA as this model of care becomes more widely adopted.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesAdultAgedCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairesaccess to carepatient-centered carepatient experiencepatient satisfactionpractice-based researchprimary careshared medical appointments

Identifiers

PMID25024240
PMCPMC4096469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.