Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25024226›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Microspatial gene expression patterns in the Amazon River Plume.

Brandon M Satinsky, Byron C Crump, Christa B Smith, Shalabh Sharma, Brian L Zielinski, Mary Doherty, Jun Meng, Shulei Sun, Patricia M Medeiros, John H Paul and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon M SatinskyDepartments of Microbiology and.
Byron C CrumpCollege of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331;
Christa B SmithMarine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602;
Shalabh SharmaMarine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602;
Brian L ZielinskiCollege of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL 33701;
Mary DohertyHorn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD 21613; and.
Jun MengMarine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602;
Shulei SunCenter for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Patricia M MedeirosMarine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602;
John H PaulCollege of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL 33701;
Victoria J ColesHorn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD 21613; and.
Patricia L YagerMarine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602;
Mary Ann MoranMarine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602; mmoran@uga.edu.
University of Georgia · USCollege of Marin · USUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science · USOregon State University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated expression of genes mediating elemental cycling at the microspatial scale in the ocean's largest river plume using, to our knowledge, the first fully quantitative inventory of genes and transcripts. The bacterial and archaeal communities associated with a phytoplankton bloom in Amazon River Plume waters at the outer continental shelf in June 2010 harbored ∼ 1.0 × 10(13) genes and 4.7 × 10(11) transcripts per liter that mapped to several thousand microbial genomes. Genomes from free-living cells were more abundant than those from particle-associated cells, and they generated more transcripts per liter for carbon fixation, heterotrophy, nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, and iron acquisition, although they had lower expression ratios (transcripts ⋅ gene(-1)) overall. Genomes from particle-associated cells contributed more transcripts for sulfur cycling, aromatic compound degradation, and the synthesis of biologically essential vitamins, with an overall twofold up-regulation of expression compared with free-living cells. Quantitatively, gene regulation differences were more important than genome abundance differences in explaining why microenvironment transcriptomes differed. Taxa contributing genomes to both free-living and particle-associated communities had up to 65% of their expressed genes regulated differently between the two, quantifying the extent of transcriptional plasticity in marine microbes in situ. In response to patchiness in carbon, nutrients, and light at the micrometer scale, Amazon Plume microbes regulated the expression of genes relevant to biogeochemical processes at the ecosystem scale.

Indexed as

EcosystemWater MicrobiologyArchaeaBacteriaGene Expression Regulation, ArchaealGene Expression Regulation, BacterialRiversbiogeochemistrygene expression ratiosmarine bacteriametagenomicsmetatranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID25024226
PMCPMC4121788
OpenAlexW2029742556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.