Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25024207›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Infants' brain responses to speech suggest analysis by synthesis.

Patricia K Kuhl, Rey R Ramírez, Alexis Bosseler, Jo-Fu Lotus Lin, Toshiaki Imada

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
24.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 223 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Musical intervention enhances infants' neural processing of temporal structure in music and speech.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Ethnokinesiology: towards a neuromechanical understanding of cultural differences in movement.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Functional and structural maturation of auditory cortex from 2 months to 2 years old.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Birds and babies: Ontogeny of vocal learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Babbling opens the sensory phase for imitative vocal learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patricia K KuhlInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 pkkuhl@u.washington.edu.
Rey R RamírezInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Alexis BosselerInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Jo-Fu Lotus LinInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Toshiaki ImadaInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GURALNICK, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historic theories of speech perception (Motor Theory and Analysis by Synthesis) invoked listeners' knowledge of speech production to explain speech perception. Neuroimaging data show that adult listeners activate motor brain areas during speech perception. In two experiments using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we investigated motor brain activation, as well as auditory brain activation, during discrimination of native and nonnative syllables in infants at two ages that straddle the developmental transition from language-universal to language-specific speech perception. Adults are also tested in Exp. 1. MEG data revealed that 7-mo-old infants activate auditory (superior temporal) as well as motor brain areas (Broca's area, cerebellum) in response to speech, and equivalently for native and nonnative syllables. However, in 11- and 12-mo-old infants, native speech activates auditory brain areas to a greater degree than nonnative, whereas nonnative speech activates motor brain areas to a greater degree than native speech. This double dissociation in 11- to 12-mo-old infants matches the pattern of results obtained in adult listeners. Our infant data are consistent with Analysis by Synthesis: auditory analysis of speech is coupled with synthesis of the motor plans necessary to produce the speech signal. The findings have implications for: (i) perception-action theories of speech perception, (ii) the impact of "motherese" on early language learning, and (iii) the "social-gating" hypothesis and humans' development of social understanding.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsAuditory PerceptionBrainFrontal LobeHumansInfantLanguageMagnetoencephalographyMotor CortexSpeechSpeech PerceptionTemporal Lobebrain imagingphonetic perception

Identifiers

PMID25024207
PMCPMC4128155
OpenAlexW1988234613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.