Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25023918›Full record

ArticleMedical care2014

Development of the Primary Care Quality-Homeless (PCQ-H) instrument: a practical survey of homeless patients' experiences in primary care.

Stefan G Kertesz, David E Pollio, Richard N Jones, Jocelyn Steward, Erin J Stringfellow, Adam J Gordon, Nancy K Johnson, Theresa A Kim, Shanette G Daigle, Erika L Austin and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Stefan G Kertesz*Birmingham VA Medical Center, School of Medicine †Department of Social Work, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL ‡Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, RI §University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Health Related Professions, Birmingham, AL ∥George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO ¶VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA #Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL **Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, Boston, MA ††Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL ‡‡VA Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research Education and Clinic Center (MIRECC) §§Department of Psychiatry, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA ∥∥Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL ¶¶Johns Hopkins University, Center on Aging and Health, Baltimore ##University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD.
David E Pollio
Richard N Jones
Jocelyn Steward
Erin J Stringfellow
Adam J Gordon
Nancy K Johnson
Theresa A Kim
Shanette G Daigle
Erika L Austin
Alexander S Young
Joya G Chrystal
Lori L Davis
David L Roth
Cheryl L Holt

Funding

Transdisciplinary Training in Addictions ResearchT32DA015035 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Leopoldo J Cabassa, Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg · 2002 to 2026
$5.3M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA015035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHomeless patients face unique challenges in obtaining primary care responsive to their needs and context. Patient experience questionnaires could permit assessment of patient-centered medical homes for this population, but standard instruments may not reflect homeless patients' priorities and concerns.

objectivesThis report describes (a) the content and psychometric properties of a new primary care questionnaire for homeless patients; and (b) the methods utilized in its development.

methodsStarting with quality-related constructs from the Institute of Medicine, we identified relevant themes by interviewing homeless patients and experts in their care. A multidisciplinary team drafted a preliminary set of 78 items. This was administered to homeless-experienced clients (n=563) across 3 VA facilities and 1 non-VA Health Care for the Homeless Program. Using Item Response Theory, we examined Test Information Function (TIF) curves to eliminate less informative items and devise plausibly distinct subscales.

resultsThe resulting 33-item instrument (Primary Care Quality-Homeless) has 4 subscales: Patient-Clinician Relationship (15 items), Cooperation among Clinicians (3 items), Access/Coordination (11 items), and Homeless-specific Needs (4 items). Evidence for divergent and convergent validity is provided. TIF graphs showed adequate informational value to permit inferences about groups for 3 subscales (Relationship, Cooperation, and Access/Coordination). The 3-item Cooperation subscale had lower informational value (TIF<5) but had good internal consistency (α=0.75) and patients frequently reported problems in this aspect of care.

conclusionsSystematic application of qualitative and quantitative methods supported the development of a brief patient-reported questionnaire focused on the primary care of homeless patients and offers guidance for future population-specific instrument development.

Indexed as

Ill-Housed PersonsPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychometricsQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID25023918
PMCPMC4620084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.