Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25023685›Full record

ReviewThe International journal of developmental biology2014

T cell behavior at the maternal-fetal interface.

Patrice Nancy, Adrian Erlebacher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The International journal of developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrice NancyDepartment of Pathology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, USA. adrian.erlebacher@nyumc.org.
Adrian Erlebacher

Funding

Inflammation and immunity in the crucible of premalignancyR01CA168755 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ERLEBACHER, ADRIAN · 2013 to 2017
$2.2M
Epigenetic regulation of decidual inflammationR01AI106745 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ERLEBACHER, ADRIAN · 2013 to 2016
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168755NCI NIH HHS R01-CA168755NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI106745NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI106745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the function of T cells at the maternal-fetal interface remains one of the most difficult problems in reproductive immunology. A great deal of work over the last two decades has led to the view that the T cells that populate the decidua have important roles in both normal and pathological pregnancies, but the exact nature of these roles has remained unclear. Indeed, the old assumption that decidual T cells are uniformly threatening to fetal survival because the placenta is fundamentally an 'allograft' has given way to the idea that different T cell subsets contribute in different ways to pregnancy success or failure. Accordingly, some T cells are thought to protect the placenta from immune rejection and facilitate embryo implantation, while others are thought to contribute to pregnancy pathologies such as preeclampsia and spontaneous abortion. Here, we review the current state of information on the behavior of decidual T cells with a focus on both mouse and human studies, and with an emphasis on the many unresolved areas within this overall emerging framework.

Indexed as

AnimalsDeciduaFemaleHumansMaternal-Fetal ExchangeMicePlacentaPregnancyT-Lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID25023685
PMCPMC4212519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.