Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25023670›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings2014

Olmesartan, other antihypertensives, and chronic diarrhea among patients undergoing endoscopic procedures: a case-control study.

Ruby Greywoode, Eric D Braunstein, Carolina Arguelles-Grande, Peter H R Green, Benjamin Lebwohl

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Associated Enteropathy-Brief Report.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Unusual Severe Side Effect of a Commonly Used Drug.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruby GreywoodeDepartment of Medicine, Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Eric D BraunsteinDepartment of Medicine, Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Carolina Arguelles-GrandeDepartment of Medicine, Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Peter H R GreenDepartment of Medicine, Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Benjamin LebwohlDepartment of Medicine, Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Electronic address: BL114@columbia.edu.
Columbia University · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000040 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2012 to 2015
$26.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate a recent association between the use of the angiotensin receptor-blocker (ARB) olmesartan and a severe enteropathy resembling celiac disease. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe searched our endoscopy database for all outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or colonoscopy examinations in patients aged at least 50 years during the period January 1, 2007, to March 31, 2013. Cases were those whose examination indication was diarrhea, and controls were those whose examination indication was esophageal reflux (EGD) or colorectal cancer screening (colonoscopy). We compared cases with controls with regard to the proportion of those listing olmesartan among their medications. Secondary exposures were the proportion of those taking nonolmesartan ARBs or other antihypertensive medications. We also examined biopsy results to determine whether there were histologic changes associated with the use of olmesartan.

resultsWe identified 2088 patients undergoing EGD and 12,428 patients undergoing colonoscopy meeting inclusion criteria. On multivariate analysis, there was no statistically significant association between olmesartan and diarrhea among those undergoing EGD (odds ratio, 1.99; 95% CI, 0.79-5.00) or colonoscopy (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.23-1.74). Review of pathology reports of the EGD and colonoscopy groups showed no association between the use of olmesartan and the histologic diagnosis of celiac disease (P=.61) or microscopic colitis (P=1.0), respectively.

conclusionOur findings suggest that neither olmesartan nor other ARBs were associated with diarrhea among patients undergoing endoscopy. The spruelike enteropathy recently associated with olmesartan is likely a rare adverse effect and milder presentations are unlikely.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsCase-Control StudiesColonoscopyDiarrheaEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleHumansImidazolesMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsTetrazolesAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsImidazolesolmesartanTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID25023670
PMCPMC4157109
OpenAlexW2074671821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.