ArticleJournal of medical systems2014
A new method based for diagnosis of breast cancer cells from microscopic images: DWEE--JHT.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photodiagnosis and photodynamic recognition of cervical cancer with SEM and AFM images.PloS one · 2025Article
- Building a Personalized Cancer Treatment System.Journal of medical systems · 2017Article
- Diagnosis of breast cancer in light microscopic and mammographic images textures using relative entropy via kernel estimation.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In these days, there are many various diseases, whose diagnosis is very hardly. Breast cancer is one of these type diseases. In this paper, accuracy diagnosis of normal, benign, and malign breast cancer cell were found by combining mean success rates Jensen Shannon, Hellinger, and Triangle measure which connected with each other. In this article, an diagnostic method based on feature extraction Discrete Wavelet Entropy Energy (DWEE) and Jensen Shannon, Hellinger, Triangle Measure (JHT) Classifier for diagnosis of breast cancer. This diagnosis method is called as DWEE--JHT this paper. With this diagnosis method have found optimal feature subset using discrete wavelet transform feature extraction. Then these convenient features are given to Jensen Shannon, Hellinger, Triangle Measure (JHT) classifier. Then, between classifiers which are Jensen Shannon, Hellinger, and triangle distance have been validated the measures via relationships. Afterwards, breast cancer cells are classified using Jensen Shannon, Hellinger, and Triangle distance. Mean success rate of 16 feature vector with Jensen Shannon classifier is found % 97.81. Mean success rate of 16 feature vector with Hellinger classifier is found % 97.75. Mean success rate of 16 feature vector with Triangle classifier is found % 97.87. By averaging of results obtained from these 3 classifiers are found as 97.81 % average of accuracy diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.