Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25023626›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2014

Comparison of molecular and immunocytochemical methods for detection of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow from early breast cancer patients.

Bjørnar Gilje, Oddmund Nordgård, Kjersti Tjensvoll, Elin Borgen, Marit Synnestvedt, Rune Smaaland, Bjørn Naume

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00248703 (Secondary Adjuvant), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00248703 phase2completednot on this map

Secondary Adjuvant (Rescue) Treatment With Docetaxel (Taxotere) and Detection of Isolated Tumor Cells in Bone Marrow as a Surrogate Marker for Effect in Node Positive and High Risk Node Negative Breast Cancer After Standard Adjuvant Epirubicin-containing Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2003 to 2022Enrolled1,128ConditionsBreast CancerArmsDocetaxel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bjørnar GiljeDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway. bjgilje@gmail.com.
Oddmund Nordgård
Kjersti Tjensvoll
Elin Borgen
Marit Synnestvedt
Rune Smaaland
Bjørn Naume
Stavanger University Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NOBreast Cancer Research Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisseminated tumor cells (DTCs) have potential to predict the effect of adjuvant treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare two methods, reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and immunocytochemisty (ICC), for detecting breast cancer DTCs in bone marrow (BM) from early breast cancer patients.

methodsWe investigated a subset (n = 313) of BM samples obtained from 271 early breast cancer patients in the "Secondary Adjuvant Taxotere Treatment" (SATT)-trial. All patients in this study had node positive or intermediate/high-risk node negative non-metastatic disease. The DTCs were detected by ICC using AE1-AE3 anti-cytokeratin monoclonal antibodies. Patients with DTCs detected in their BM by ICC after standard adjuvant fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin (FEC) chemotherapy were offered docetaxel treatment. For comparison, 5 × 106 mononuclear cells from the aliquoted BM samples were also analyzed by RT-qPCR using a multimarker (MM) assay based on the tumor cell mRNA markers keratin 19 (KRT19), mammaglobin A (hMAM), and TWIST1. In the MM-assay, a sample was defined as positive for DTCs if at least one of the mRNA markers was positive.

resultsThe MM RT-qPCR assay identified DTCs in 124 (40%) of the 313 BM samples compared with 23/313 (7%) of the samples analyzed by ICC. The concordance between the MM RT-qPCR and ICC was 61% (Kappa value = 0.04) and twelve of the BM samples were positive by both methods. By RT-qPCR, 46/313 (15%) samples were positive for KRT19, 97/313 (31%) for TWIST1, and 3/313 (1%) for hMAM mRNA. There were no statistically significant associations between the individual mRNA markers.

conclusionThe RT-qPCR based method demonstrated more DTC-positive samples than ICC. The relatively low concordance of positive DTC-status between the two different assessment methods suggests that they may be complementary. The clinical relevance of the methods will be evaluated based on future clinical outcome data.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00248703.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBone MarrowBreast NeoplasmsDocetaxelFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTaxoidsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorDocetaxelTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID25023626
PMCPMC4223548
OpenAlexW2034188004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.