Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25023620›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2014

The dysfunction of T follicular helper cells.

Rafael Cubas, Matthieu Perreau

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. B-cell responses to HIV infection.Immunological reviews · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The challenges of modelling antibody repertoire dynamics in HIV infection.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafael CubasaVaccine and Gene Therapy Institute of Florida, Port St. Lucie, Florida, USA bDivisions of Immunology and Allergy, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Matthieu Perreau
University of Lausanne · CHVaccine & Gene Therapy Institute of Florida · US

Funding

Boosting anti-HIV immunity through manipulation of Tfh function.R01AI106482 · NIAID · VGTI FLORIDA · PI HADDAD, ELIAS K · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
NIAID NIH HHS 1R01AI106482-01AINIAID NIH HHS R01 AI106482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewT follicular helper (Tfh) cells play a critical role as providers of B-cell help and dysfunction in Tfh/B-cell interactions can lead to autoimmunity or immunodeficiency. These observations have generated a great deal of interest in understanding how these cells are affected during HIV infection and how their functional changes might affect antibody responses. RECENT

findingsRecent studies have shown that HIV/simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection affects both Tfh-cell frequency and function and suggest that Tfh-cell perturbations might contribute to the relative inefficiency of HIV-infected individuals to generate broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). SUMMARY: The present review will highlight these recent findings addressing the role of Tfh cells in HIV infection as well as the impact HIV infection has on Tfh and circulating memory Tfh (cTfh) cell frequency and function.

Indexed as

B-LymphocytesHIV InfectionsT-Lymphocytes, Helper-InducerAnimalsHIVHumansMacacaSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeSimian Immunodeficiency Virus

Identifiers

PMID25023620
PMCPMC4176897
OpenAlexW2315176554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.