ReviewNature reviews. Urology2014
Enhanced recovery programmes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between use of ERAS protocols and complications after radical cystectomy.World journal of urology · 2022Article
- Review
- Combination of C-Reactive Protein and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Novel Prognostic Index in Patients With Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal urinary diversions after laparoscopic radical cystectomy in females with bladder cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2019Article
- Evaluation of an enhanced recovery protocol on patients having radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018Article
- A Retrospective Study Comparing Surgical and Early Oncological Outcomes between Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Ileal Conduit after Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy from a Single Center.Chinese medical journal · 2018Article
- Bladder Cancer Recovery Pathways: A Systematic Review.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2017Article
- The Preoperative Assessment and Optimization of Patients Undergoing Major Urological Surgery.Current urology reports · 2017Review
- Current Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion.Current urology reports · 2016Review
- Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) in robotic cystectomy surgery. Review of current status and trends.Current urology reports · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radical cystectomy is associated with high rates of surgical morbidity. The magnitude of the surgical insult is associated with the degree of stress response, particularly in ageing patients with multiple comorbidities. Attempts to limit this response and identify areas of improvement with respect to patient selection and optimization, anaesthesia, surgical technique and postoperative care underpin the multimodal approach to enhanced recovery pathways. No single intervention significantly reduces morbidity, but the combination of many interventions at all levels of the pathway is likely to accelerate the patient journey from diagnosis to return to normal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25023593What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.