Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25023473›Full record

ArticleContraception2014

Dual method use at last sexual encounter: a nationally representative, episode-level analysis of US men and women.

Jenny A Higgins, Nicole K Smith, Stephanie A Sanders, Vanessa Schick, Debby Herbenick, Michael Reece, Brian Dodge, J Dennis Fortenberry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dual method use among long-acting reversible contraceptive users.The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception · 2018
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jenny A HigginsGender & Women's Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: jahiggins2@wisc.edu.
Nicole K SmithOffice of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Stephanie A SandersThe Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Vanessa SchickUniversity of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Debby HerbenickThe Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. Electronic address: debby@indiana.edu.
Michael ReeceUniversity of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Brian DodgeCenter for Sexual Health Promotion, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
J Dennis FortenberryAdolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

Infrastructure for Population Research at PrincetonR24HD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2004 to 2013
$7.3M
Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD047873 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Katherine J. Curtis · 2014 to 2026
$5.1M
BUILDING INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH CAREER IN WOMEN'S HEALTH (BIRCWH) SCHOLARSK12HD055894 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURNSIDE, ELIZABETH S · 2007 to 2016
$4.1M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055894NICHD NIH HHS K12HD055894NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047873NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD047879NICHD NIH HHS R24HD047879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMale condom use in conjunction with other contraceptives increases protection against pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. However, few analyses contextualize dual method use within the sexual episode, include reports from men or explore gendered patterns in reporting. STUDY

designWe analyzed dual method use patterns using a nationally representative dataset of 18-44 years old in the US (N=404 men, 416 women). Respondents indicated contraceptive methods used at last penile-vaginal intercourse, condom practices and relationship and sexual information about that particular partner.

resultsMore than one-in-three penile-vaginal intercourse episodes (40%) involved male condom use: 28% condom only and 12% condom plus a highly effective method. Dual method reporting did not differ significantly by gender. Among dual method users, only 59% reported condom use during the entire intercourse episode, while 35% began intercourse without one and 6% removed the condom during intercourse. A greater proportion of men than women reported incorrect use of condoms (49% versus 35%), though this difference was not statistically significant. Only 50% of dual method users reported condom use in all of their last 10 intercourse episodes.

conclusionsMany people classified as "dual users" in previous studies may not be using dual methods consistently or correctly. Researchers and practitioners should inquire how and how often condoms are used when assessing and addressing dual method use. Furthermore, though men have rarely been surveyed about dual method use, they can provide consistent contraceptive estimates and may be more likely to report condom practices such as late application or early removal. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Many US women and men reporting dual method use also reported late application and early removal of condoms, as well as multiple condom-less prior sexual acts with that partner. Clinicians may wish to inquire how and how often clients use condoms; they may also wish to provide condom instruction and/or tips on better integrating condoms into the sexual experience with one's partner.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsCoitusCondomsContraceptionContraception BehaviorFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleSexual PartnersUnited StatesYoung AdultCondomsDual method useDual protectionMen's contraceptive useSexual and relational aspects of contraceptive use

Identifiers

PMID25023473
PMCPMC4155004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.