Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25023390›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2015

Frequency of sternal foramen evaluated by MDCT: a minor variation of great relevance.

Marcio A Babinski, Leandro de Lemos, Monique S D Babinski, Marianna V T Gonçalves, Rafael C De Paula, Rodrigo M P Fernandes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ultrasound and bone: a pictorial review.Journal of ultrasound · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Frequency of sternal variations in living individuals.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. MDCT evaluation of sternal variations: Pictorial essay.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcio A BabinskiDepartment of Morphology, School of Medicine, Fluminense Federal University, Av. Prof. Hernani Mello 101, CEP 24.210-150, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, mababinski@gmail.com.
Leandro de Lemos
Monique S D Babinski
Marianna V T Gonçalves
Rafael C De Paula
Rodrigo M P Fernandes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to inadvertent cardiac or great vessel injury, sternal foramina may pose as a great hazard during sternal puncture. They can also be misinterpreted as osteolytic lesions in cross-sectional imaging of the sternum. The distribution of these variations differs between populations, but data from Brazilians are scarcely reported. Therefore, this study aimed to verify the frequency of midline sternal foramen and double-ended xiphoid process, as developmental variations, in order to avoid fatal complications following sternal puncture of sternal acupuncture treatment. A total of 114 chest computed tomograms were evaluated. The frequency of midline sternal foramen in a complication risk bearing feature is of approximately 10.5%. The double-ended xiphoid process was present in 17.5%. We conclude that sternal acupuncture should be planned in the region of corpus-previous CT should be done to rule out this variation. Furthermore, we strongly recommend the acupuncture technique which prescribes a safe superficial-oblique approach to the sternum.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSternotomySternumXiphoid BoneYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.