ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII1989
Augmented induction of antitumor cells in vivo by cyclophosphamide fails to benefit antitumor resistance of the host.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effector molecules from antitumor macrophages induced with OK-432 and cyclophosphamide.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 1992Article
- Cyclophosphamide modifies the induction kinetics but not cell types and cytotoxic mechanisms of antitumor cells elicited with OK-432 plus attenuated tumor cells.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 1991Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study was designed to examine whether cyclophosphamide augmented induction of antitumor cells and antitumor resistance in C57BL/6 mice pretreated with mitomycin-C-treated EL4 cells (EL4MMC) plus OK-432, a streptococcal preparation. C57BL/6 mice were pretreated with EL4MMC (10(7] plus OK-432 (2.5 KE) i.p. twice at 1-week intervals. When the mice received an i.p. injection of cyclophosphamide at 200 mg/kg 2 days before the last treatment, the antitumor activity of their spleen cells and peritoneal exudate cells (PEC) was effectively augmented 7-8 days after the last treatment. Splenic antitumor activity disappeared 15 days after the last treatment whereas augmented antitumor activity of the PEC was detected even 28 days after the last treatment. This cyclophosphamide effect was dose-dependent and 200 mg/kg was the most effective among the doses tested. If the EL4MMC plus OK-432 treatment was injected at a s.c. site, it was also effective in combination with cyclophosphamide. The antitumor activity of the PEC from s.c.-pretreated mice, however, was lower than that from i.p.-pretreated mice. Despite the fact that cyclophosphamide effectively augmented induction of antitumor cells in C57BL/6 mice pretreated with EL4MMC plus OK-432, it diminished rather than augmented, under all conditions tested, the ability of the mice to resist a challenge of live EL4 cells. Reduction of antitumor resistance by cyclophosphamide was also observed in an experimental system of a semi-syngeneic host (BDF1) tumor (EL4). These results indicate that augmentation of in vivo induction of certain kinds of antitumor cells does not necessarily result in a beneficial augmentation of the host's ability to resist tumor growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.