ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2014
Nuclear receptors and epigenetic regulation: opportunities for nutritional targeting and disease prevention.
Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lactoferrin supplementation modulates the oxidative and metabolic genes by NR5A2-mediated histone modifications in deoxynivalenol-induced ileum injury.Stress biology · 2025Article
- Targeting Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) for developing novel therapeutics against cancer.Molecular biomedicine · 2021Review
- Human nuclear receptors (NRs) genes have prognostic significance in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Involvement of circulating factors in the transmission of paternal experiences through the germline.The EMBO journal · 2020Article
- Epigenetic Regulation and Dietary Control of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.Frontiers in nutrition · 2020Review
- The Way to a Human's Brain Goes Through Their Stomach: Dietary Factors in Major Depressive Disorder.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
- Article
- Integrated omics approaches to characterize a nuclear receptor corepressor-associated histone deacetylase in mouse skeletal muscle.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2018Review
- The PPARα-dependent rodent liver tumor response is not relevant to humans: addressing misconceptions.Archives of toxicology · 2018Review
- Biotin: From Nutrition to Therapeutics.The Journal of nutrition · 2017Review
- Impact of Drug Treatment at Neonatal Ages on Variability of Drug Metabolism and Drug-drug Interactions in Adult Life.Current pharmacology reports · 2017Article
- Visualizing the Architectures and Interactions of Nuclear Receptors.Endocrinology · 2016Review
- Constitutive expression of AhR and BRCA-1 promoter CpG hypermethylation as biomarkers of ERα-negative breast tumorigenesis.BMC cancer · 2015Article
- From inflammaging to healthy aging by dietary lifestyle choices: is epigenetics the key to personalized nutrition?Clinical epigenetics · 2015Article
- Impact of soy isoflavones on the epigenome in cancer prevention.Nutrients · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Posttranslational modifications of histones, alterations in the recruitment and functions of non-histone proteins, DNA methylation, and changes in expression of noncoding RNAs contribute to current models of epigenetic regulation. Nuclear receptors (NRs) are a group of transcription factors that, through ligand-binding, act as sensors to changes in nutritional, environmental, developmental, pathophysiologic, and endocrine conditions and drive adaptive responses via gene regulation. One mechanism through which NRs direct gene expression is the assembly of transcription complexes with cofactors and coregulators that possess chromatin-modifying properties. Chromatin modifications can be transient or become part of the cellular "memory" and contribute to genomic imprinting. Because many food components bind to NRs, they can ultimately influence transcription of genes associated with biologic processes, such as inflammation, proliferation, apoptosis, and hormonal response, and alter the susceptibility to chronic diseases (e.g., cancer, diabetes, obesity). The objective of this review is to highlight how NRs influence epigenetic regulation and the relevance of dietary compound-NR interactions in human nutrition and for disease prevention and treatment. Identifying gene targets of unliganded and bound NRs may assist in the development of epigenetic maps for food components and dietary patterns. Progress in these areas may lead to the formulation of disease-prevention models based on epigenetic control by individual or associations of food ligands of NRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.