Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25022981›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2014

Perioperative antibiotics covering bile contamination prevent abdominal infectious complications after pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with preoperative biliary drainage.

Takeshi Sudo, Yoshiaki Murakami, Kenichiro Uemura, Yasushi Hashimoto, Naru Kondo, Naoya Nakagawa, Hiroki Ohge, Taijiro Sueda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Impact of Extended Antibiotic Use After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Patients with Preoperative Metallic Biliary Stenting Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  16. Intraoperative Bile Culture in Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Teaching Old Dogma New Tricks.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Relative Role of Bile Bacterial Isolation on Outcome in Stent-Bearing Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takeshi SudoDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan, tsudo@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Yoshiaki Murakami
Kenichiro Uemura
Yasushi Hashimoto
Naru Kondo
Naoya Nakagawa
Hiroki Ohge
Taijiro Sueda
Hiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough bile contamination caused by preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) is a risk factor for infectious complications after pancreatoduodenectomy, the appropriate perioperative antibiotic regimen remains unclear. We evaluated a perioperative antibiotic strategy targeting bile contamination associated with PBD procedures for preventing abdominal infectious complications after pancreatoduodenectomy.

methodsConsecutive patients (n = 254) underwent pancreatoduodenectomy at a single center. Perioperative antibiotics were mainly cefazolin in non-PBD cases (n = 116) and cefozopran in internal-PBD cases (n = 87). They were based on preoperative bile cultures in 51 of the external-PBD cases. Intraoperative bile cultures were examined prospectively. Morbidity and abdominal infectious complication rates were evaluated.

resultsThe incidence of positive intraoperative bile cultures was significantly higher in the internal-PBD (85 %) and external-PBD (90 %) cases than in the non-PBD cases (26 %) (p < 0.001). The 91 % susceptibility to cefazolin for non-PBD was significantly higher than the 61 % for internal-PBD or 45 % for external-PBD (p < 0.001). Overall morbidity rates (23, 23, and 25 %) and abdominal infectious complications (13, 17, and 14 %) did not differ among the non-PBD, internal-PBD, and external-PBD cases, respectively. Only susceptibility to perioperative antibiotics of biliary microorganisms classified as resistant was a significant independent risk factor for abdominal infectious complications (p = 0.003).

conclusionsA perioperative antibiotic strategy particular to PBD procedures is valid for covering biliary microorganisms during pancreatoduodenectomy. Perioperative antibiotics covering bile contamination may prevent abdominal infectious complications after pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with and without PBD.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBileCefazolinCefozopranCephalosporinsColony Count, MicrobialDrainageFemaleHumansIntraabdominal InfectionsMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPancreaticoduodenectomyAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinCefozopranCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID25022981
OpenAlexW2044453827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.