Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25022774›Full record

Trial reportBehavior therapy2014

Altering impulsive decision making with an acceptance-based procedure.

Kate L Morrison, Gregory J Madden, Amy L Odum, Jonathan E Friedel, Michael P Twohig

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavior therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05845164 (Impulsivity Mediation Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Paired With Acceptance Commitment Therapy as an Adjunctive Therapy for Substance Use Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05845164 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Impulsivity Mediation Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Paired With Acceptance Commitment Therapy as an Adjunctive Therapy for Substance Use Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArizonaRan2023 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsSubstance Use Disorders, Substance Abuse, Substance UseArmstDCS, tDCS Sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The effects of the framing of time on delay discounting.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2015
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cognitive and behavioral training interventions to promote self-control.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kate L MorrisonUtah State University.
Gregory J MaddenUtah State University.
Amy L OdumUtah State University.
Jonathan E FriedelUtah State University.
Michael P TwohigUtah State University. Electronic address: michael.twohig@usu.edu.

Funding

Understanding delay discounting in cigarette smokersR01DA029100 · NIDA · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ODUM, AMY · 2011 to 2015
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delay discounting is one facet of impulsive decision making and involves subjectively devaluing a delayed outcome. Steeply discounting delayed rewards is correlated with substance abuse and other problematic behaviors. To the extent that steep delay discounting underlies these clinical disorders, it would be advantageous to find psychosocial avenues for reducing delay discounting. Acceptance-based interventions may prove useful as they may help to decrease the distress that arises while waiting for a delayed outcome. The current study was conducted to determine if a 60-90 minute acceptance-based training would change delay discounting rates among 30 undergraduate university students in comparison to a waitlist control. Measures given at pre- and posttraining included a hypothetical monetary delay discounting task, the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), and the Distress Tolerance Scale. Those assigned to the treatment group decreased their discounting of delayed money, but not distress intolerance or psychological inflexibility when compared to the waitlist control group. After the waiting period, the control group received the intervention. Combining all participants' pre- to posttreatment data, the acceptance-based treatment significantly decreased discounting of monetary rewards and increased distress tolerance. The difference in AAQ-II approached significance. Acceptance-based treatments may be a worthwhile option for decreasing delay discounting rates and, consequently, affecting the choices that underlie addiction and other problematic behaviors.

Indexed as

Delay DiscountingImpulsive BehaviorAdolescentAdultChoice BehaviorCognitive Behavioral TherapyDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleStudentsSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultacceptanceACTdelay discountingdistress toleranceimpulsivity

Identifiers

PMID25022774
PMCPMC5661961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.