Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2014
Use of a computerized decision aid for developmental surveillance and screening: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01351077 (A Study to Determine if CHICA Can Improve Developmental Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Study to Determine if CHICA Can Improve Developmental Screening
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Developmental Screening Tools Used with First Nations Populations: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2019Trial
- Parent eReferral to Tobacco Quitline: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial in Pediatric Primary Care.American journal of preventive medicine · 2019Trial
- Effectiveness of Computer Automation for the Diagnosis and Management of Childhood Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA pediatrics · 2017Trial
- Computer Decision Support Changes Physician Practice But Not Knowledge Regarding Autism Spectrum Disorders.Applied clinical informatics · 2015Trial
- Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of pediatric neurodevelopmental disorders: a scoping review.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- Implementing an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Pediatric Primary Care Sleep Screener.JAMA network open · 2025Observational
- Standardizing and Improving Primary Care-Based Electronic Developmental Screening for Young Children in Federally Qualified Health Center Clinics.Maternal and child health journal · 2024Article
- The Application of Knowledge-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems to Enhance Adherence to Evidence-Based Medicine in Chronic Disease.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support in pediatrics.Pediatric research · 2023Review
- The Role of Virtual Triage in Improving Clinician Experience and Satisfaction: A Narrative Review.Telemedicine reports · 2023Review
- Developmental screening tools for identification of children with developmental difficulties in high-income countries: a systematic review.Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry · 2023Review
- Novel Nitrogen-Based Chalcone Analogs Provoke Substantial Apoptosis in HER2-Positive Human Breast Cancer Cells via JNK and ERK1/ERK2 Signaling Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Awareness screening and referral patterns among pediatricians in the United States related to early clinical features of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).BMC pediatrics · 2021Article
- Improving Patient-Centered Communication about Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy through Computerized Clinical Decision Support.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- Elaboration of Screening Scales for Mental Development Problems Detection in Russian Preschool Children: Psychometric Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Assessment of Pediatrician Awareness and Implementation of the Addendum Guidelines for the Prevention of Peanut Allergy in the United States.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Community-Engaged Research to Translate Developmental Screening and Referral Processes into Locally-Relevant, Family-Centered Language.Maternal and child health journal · 2020Article
- Evolving Roles for Health Care in Supporting Healthy Child Development.The Future of children · 2020Article
- Caregiver Comfort in Adolescents Independently Completing Screening Tablet-Based Questionnaires at Primary Care Visits.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceDevelopmental delays and disabilities are common in children. Research has indicated that intervention during the early years of a child's life has a positive effect on cognitive development, social skills and behavior, and subsequent school performance.
objectiveTo determine whether a computerized clinical decision support system is an effective approach to improve standardized developmental surveillance and screening (DSS) within primary care practices. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsIn this cluster randomized clinical trial performed in 4 pediatric clinics from June 1, 2010, through December 31, 2012, children younger than 66 months seen for primary care were studied.
interventionsWe compared surveillance and screening practices after adding a DSS module to an existing computer decision support system. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The rates at which children were screened for developmental delay.
resultsMedical records were reviewed for 360 children (180 each in the intervention and control groups) to compare rates of developmental screening at the 9-, 18-, or 30-month well-child care visits. The DSS module led to a significant increase in the percentage of patients screened with a standardized screening tool (85.0% vs 24.4%, P < .001). An additional 120 records (60 each in the intervention and control groups) were reviewed to examine surveillance rates at visits outside the screening windows. The DSS module led to a significant increase in the percentage of patients whose parents were assessed for concerns about their child's development (71.7% vs 41.7%, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Using a computerized clinical decision support system to automate the screening of children for developmental delay significantly increased the numbers of children screened at 9, 18, and 30 months of age. It also significantly improved surveillance at other visits. Moreover, it increased the number of children who ultimately were diagnosed as having developmental delay and who were referred for timely services at an earlier age.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01351077.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.