Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25022632›Full record

ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2014

Evolution of lipid management guidelines: evidence might set you free.

N John Bosomworth

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

N John BosomworthAn honorary lecturer in the Department of Family Practice at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, BC. jbosomworth@gmail.com.
Spinal Cord Injury BC · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand how the new guidelines for management of cardiovascular risk by the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology (AHA-ACC) can be interpreted and used in a Canadian setting. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The AHA-ACC guidelines were reviewed, along with all references. Independent PubMed searches were done to include the addition of other lipid-lowering therapy to statins and the use of medical calculators to enhance patient understanding. MAIN MESSAGE: The new AHA-ACC guidelines are based on the best current evidence related to lipid management. This includes use of 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk as the treatment threshold in place of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, as well as abandonment of low-density lipoprotein treatment targets. There is increased emphasis on dietary and exercise interventions, with the beginning of an effort to quantify the effect of these interventions. Statins are the main drug intervention, and the addition of other drugs to augment lipid lowering is no longer recommended. For application in Canada, Framingham risk tables are more appropriate for risk assessment than the pooled cohort equations used in the United States. Risk calculators for CVD risk should contain information on cardiovascular age and have the ability to represent risk and alternative interventions graphically in order to improve patient understanding and promote informed decision making.

conclusionFocus on the best evidence in CVD risk can simplify lipid management for both the physician and the patient.

Indexed as

CardiologyPractice Guidelines as TopicSocieties, MedicalCanadaCardiovascular DiseasesDietDyslipidemiasEvidence-Based MedicineExerciseHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPatient ParticipationRisk AssessmentUnited StatesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25022632
PMCPMC4096258
OpenAlexW1874730789

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.