Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25022586›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

In vivo assessment of SMT19969 in a hamster model of clostridium difficile infection.

William Weiss, Mark Pulse, Richard Vickers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The state of play of rodent models for the study ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2024
    Review
  6. European Practice for CDI Treatment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Novel Antimicrobials for the Treatment ofFrontiers in medicine · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William WeissUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA william.weiss@unthsc.edu.
Mark PulseUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Richard VickersSummit plc, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SMT19969 [2,2'-bis(4-pyridyl)3H,3'-H 5,5-bibenzimidazole] is a novel narrow-spectrum nonabsorbable antibiotic currently in development for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. The comparative activities of SMT19969 and vancomycin against nonepidemic and epidemic strains of C. difficile were studied in an established hamster model. Against nonepidemic (VA11) strains, the survival rates of SMT19969-treated animals ranged from 80% to 95%. Vancomycin exhibited 100% protection during treatment, with relapse observed starting on day 9 and 50% survival at day 20. At 50 mg/kg of body weight, SMT19969 administered orally once daily for 5 days provided full protection of treated animals on the dosing days and through day 12 against epidemic strains. Vancomycin also protected during the dosing interval, but apparent relapse occurred earlier, starting on day 11. SMT19969 exhibited excellent in vitro activity, with MICs of 0.25 μg/ml for all isolates. The MICs for vancomycin were 2- to 4-fold higher at ≤0.5 to 1 μg/ml. All plasma sample concentrations of SMT19969 were below the limit of quantification (25 ng/ml) at all time points, consistent with the reported lack of bioavailability of the compound. Cecal concentrations were significantly above the MIC (ranging from 96 μg/ml to 172 μg/ml).

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsCricetinaeMaleMesocricetusMetronidazoleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsMetronidazoleVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID25022586
PMCPMC4187990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.