Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25020129›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Number of published randomized controlled multi center trials testing pharmacological interventions or devices is increasing in both medical and surgical specialties.

Anne Kjaergaard Danielsen, Cecilie Okholm, Hans-Christian Pommergaard, Jakob Burcharth, Jacob Rosenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne Kjaergaard DanielsenDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Technology, Metropolitan University College, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cecilie OkholmDepartment of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Hans-Christian PommergaardDepartment of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Jakob BurcharthDepartment of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Jacob RosenbergDepartment of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn general, there is a need for testing new interventions in large randomized controlled trials. Depending on the research question it may be advantageous to establish multicenter studies as a way of organizing clinical trials in order to increase study power. MAIN

objectivesThe object of this study was to investigate the development in the organization of multicenter studies, the distribution of studies within different clinical specialties, across continents, and investigate the differences related to testing various interventions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A literature search was done in MEDLINE for multicenter studies published in 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010, respectively. Data extraction identified data related to clinical specialties, interventions, participating patients, departments, countries, and continents.

resultsThe number of multicenter studies increased from 112 in 1995 to 1,273 in 2010, with a larger share of multicenter studies being performed in Europe and North America. The pharmacological interventions were primarily being tested in medical studies followed by the device tests predominantly in surgical studies. The number of included patients as well as the number of participating departments increased during the time span, though the increase in studies was most evident in Europe and North America compared with the rest of the world.

Indexed as

Pharmacology, ClinicalEquipment and SuppliesEuropeHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNorth AmericaPublicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpecialties, Surgical

Identifiers

PMID25020129
PMCPMC4096394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.