Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25019505›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Prognostic value of miR-21 in various cancers: an updating meta-analysis.

Xin Zhou, Xiaping Wang, Zebo Huang, Jian Wang, Wei Zhu, Yongqian Shu, Ping Liu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. microRNA-21 Regulates Stemness in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Three plasma-based microRNAs as potent diagnostic biomarkers for endometrial cancer.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xin ZhouDepartment of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaping WangKey Laboratory of Human Functional Genomics of Jiangsu Province, Clinical Diabetes Centre of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zebo HuangDepartment of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Wei ZhuDepartment of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yongqian ShuDepartment of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Cancer Center of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Ping LiuDepartment of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Cancer Center of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, more and more studies investigated the value of microRNA (miRNA) as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker in various cancers. MiR-21 was found dysregulated in almost all types of cancers. While the prognostic role of miR-21 in many cancers has been studied, the results were not consistent.

methodsWe performed a meta-analysis to investigate the correlation between miR-21 and survival of general cancers by calculating pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsThe pooled results of 63 published studies showed that elevated miR-21 was a predictor for poor survival of general carcinomas, with pooled HR of 1.91 (95%CI: 1.66-2.19) for OS, 1.42 (95% CI: 1.16-1.74) for DFS and 2.2 (95% CI: 1.64-2.96) for RFS/CSS. MiR-21 was also a prognostic biomarker in the patients who received adjuvant therapy, with pooled HR of 2.4 (95%CI: 1.18-4.9) for OS.

conclusionsOur results showed that miR-21 could act as a significant biomarker in the prognosis of various cancers. Further studies are warranted before the application of the useful biomarker in the clinical.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorLinear ModelsMicroRNAsNeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisPublication BiasSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN21 microRNA, human

Identifiers

PMID25019505
PMCPMC4097394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.