Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25018782›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2014

Serum HE4, CA125, YKL-40, bcl-2, cathepsin-L and prediction optimal debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer.

Anita Monika Chudecka-Głaz, Aneta Alicja Cymbaluk-Płoska, Janusz Leszek Menkiszak, Agnieszka Monika Sompolska-Rzechuła, Aleksandra Izabela Tołoczko-Grabarek, Izabella Anna Rzepka-Górska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Serum HE4 superior to CA125 in predicting poorer surgical outcome of epithelial ovarian cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anita Monika Chudecka-GłazDepartment of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Aneta Alicja Cymbaluk-PłoskaDepartment of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Janusz Leszek MenkiszakDepartment of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Agnieszka Monika Sompolska-RzechułaDepartment of Mathematics Applications in Economy, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland.
Aleksandra Izabela Tołoczko-GrabarekInternational Hereditary Cancer Centre, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Izabella Anna Rzepka-GórskaDepartment of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Pomeranian Medical University · PLWest Pomeranian University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe most important prognostic factor in the ovarian cancer is optimal cytoreduction. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy, an only optional method of treatment in this case and is still the subject of debate. The object of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of markers: CA 125, HE4, YKL-40 and bcl-2 as well as cathepsin L in predicting optimal cytoreduction and response to chemotherapy.

methodsSera were secured preoperatively. The division into groups was performed retrospectively depending on the method of treatment (surgery vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy) as well as on response to chemotherapy (sensitive vs resistant vs refractory). Comparisons were made between groups, and the diagnostic usefulness of tested proteins was examined.

resultsWe found that statistically significant differences between primary operated patients and patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were applicable only to the tumour markers (CA125 1206.79 vs 2432.38, p=0.000191; HE4 78.87 vs 602.45, p=0.000004; YKL-40 108.13 vs 203.96, p=0.003991). Cathepsin-L and Bcl-2 were statistically insignificant. The cut-off point values were determined for the CA 125 (345 mIU/ml), HE4 (218.43 pmol/L) and YKL-40 (140.9 ng/ml). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were as follows: CA125 (83.3%; 75%; 80.6%; 78.3%), HE4 (86.6%; 91.3%; 92.9%; 84%) and YKL-40 (75%; 83.3%; 84%; 74.1%).

conclusionAmong the tested proteins the HE4 marker appears to be helpful in forecasting of optimal cytoreduction and possibly also of the prediction of response to platinum analogues used in first-line treatment of ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

ProteinsAdipokinesAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCathepsin LChitinase-3-Like Protein 1Cytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLectinsMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingAdipokinesBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCathepsin LCHI3L1 protein, humanChitinase-3-Like Protein 1LectinsProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2WAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2WFDC2 protein, humanCA125Cathepsin-LDebulking surgeryHE4Neoadjuvant chemotherapyOvarian cancerYKL-40

Identifiers

PMID25018782
PMCPMC4094548
OpenAlexW2147746402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.