Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25018747›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2014

How implementation of systems biology into clinical trials accelerates understanding of diseases.

Bibiana Bielekova, Yoram Vodovotz, Gary An, John Hallenbeck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Coaching for Cognition in Alzheimer's (COCOA) trial: Study design.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Daclizumab Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Heart-Rate Variability-More than Heart Beats?Frontiers in public health · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bibiana BielekovaNeuroimmunological Diseases Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, MD , USA ; Center for Human Immunology of the National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, MD , USA.
Yoram VodovotzDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA , USA ; Center for Inflammation and Regenerative Modeling, McGowan Institute of Regenerative Medicine , Pittsburgh, PA , USA.
Gary AnCenter for Inflammation and Regenerative Modeling, McGowan Institute of Regenerative Medicine , Pittsburgh, PA , USA ; Department of Surgery, Northwestern University , Chicago, IL , USA.
John HallenbeckStroke Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, MD , USA.

Funding

Regulation of Intestinal Mucosal Injury & Repair After Trauma/Hemorrhagic ShockP50GM053789 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI VODOVOTZ, YORAM · 1997 to 2013
$18.0M
Protective Mechanisms In Cerebral IschemiaZIANS002924 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI HALLENBECK, JOHN · 2009 to 2018
$16.5M
From therapeutic mechanisms to unraveling the pathophysiology of MSZIANS003056 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI BIELEKOVA, BIBIANA · 2009 to 2018
$14.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM053789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems biology comprises a series of concepts and approaches that have been used successfully both to delineate novel biological mechanisms and to drive translational advances. The goal of systems biology is to re-integrate putatively critical elements extracted from multi-modality datasets in order to understand how interactions among multiple components form functional networks at the organism/patient-level, and how dysfunction of these networks underlies a particular disease. Due to the genetic and environmental diversity of human subjects, identification of critical elements related to a particular disease process from cross-sectional studies requires prohibitively large cohorts. Alternatively, implementation of systems biology principles to interventional clinical trials represents a unique opportunity to gain predictive understanding of complex diseases in comparatively small cohorts of patients. This paper reviews systems biology principles applicable to translational research, focusing on lessons from systems approaches to inflammation applied to multiple sclerosis. We suggest that employing systems biology methods in the design and execution of biomarker-supported, proof-of-principle clinical trials provides a singular opportunity to merge therapeutic development with a basic understanding of disease processes. The ultimate goal is to develop predictive computational models of the disease, which will revolutionize diagnostic process and provide mechanistic understanding necessary for personalized therapeutic approaches. Added, biologically meaningful information can be derived from diagnostic tests, if they are interpreted in functional relationships, rather than as independent measurements. Such systems biology based diagnostics will transform disease taxonomies from phenotypical to molecular and will allow physicians to select optimal therapeutic regimens for individual patients.

Indexed as

clinical trialsclinical trials methodologymultiple sclerosispolygenic diseasessystems biology

Identifiers

PMID25018747
PMCPMC4073421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.