ReviewFrontiers in neurology2014
How implementation of systems biology into clinical trials accelerates understanding of diseases.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current Status and Future Opportunities in Modeling Clinical Characteristics of Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and systems biology analysis in stem cell research and therapeutics development.Stem cells translational medicine · 2025Review
- Modeling cell populations metabolism and competition under maximum power constraints.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Systems biology platform for efficient development and translation of multitargeted therapeutics.Frontiers in systems biology · 2023Article
- The Coaching for Cognition in Alzheimer's (COCOA) trial: Study design.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2022Article
- Serum lactate dehydrogenase activities as systems biomarkers for 48 types of human diseases.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Using Stock-Flow Diagrams to Visualize Theranostic Approaches to Solid Tumors in Personalized Nanomedicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Onset Symptom Clusters in Multiple Sclerosis: Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Risk Factors.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Decoding Susceptibility to Respiratory Viral Infections and Asthma Inception in Children.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Daclizumab Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019Review
- Molecular-based diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and its progressive stage.Annals of neurology · 2017Article
- Promise, Progress, and Pitfalls in the Search for Central Nervous System Biomarkers in Neuroimmunological Diseases: A Role for Cerebrospinal Fluid Immunophenotyping.Seminars in pediatric neurology · 2017Review
- Conceptual Foundations of Systems Biology Explaining Complex Cardiac Diseases.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- New Multiple Sclerosis Disease Severity Scale Predicts Future Accumulation of Disability.Frontiers in neurology · 2017Article
- Evidence of disease control: a realistic concept beyond NEDA in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.F1000Research · 2017Article
- Heart-Rate Variability-More than Heart Beats?Frontiers in public health · 2017Review
- The CXCL12/CXCR7 signaling axis, isoforms, circadian rhythms, and tumor cellular composition dictate gradients in tissue.PloS one · 2017Article
- Novel composite MRI scale correlates highly with disability in multiple sclerosis patients.Multiple sclerosis and related disorders · 2015Article
- Diagnostic assessment of osteosarcoma chemoresistance based on Virtual Clinical Trials.Medical hypotheses · 2015Article
- Omic personality: implications of stable transcript and methylation profiles for personalized medicine.Genome medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Systems biology comprises a series of concepts and approaches that have been used successfully both to delineate novel biological mechanisms and to drive translational advances. The goal of systems biology is to re-integrate putatively critical elements extracted from multi-modality datasets in order to understand how interactions among multiple components form functional networks at the organism/patient-level, and how dysfunction of these networks underlies a particular disease. Due to the genetic and environmental diversity of human subjects, identification of critical elements related to a particular disease process from cross-sectional studies requires prohibitively large cohorts. Alternatively, implementation of systems biology principles to interventional clinical trials represents a unique opportunity to gain predictive understanding of complex diseases in comparatively small cohorts of patients. This paper reviews systems biology principles applicable to translational research, focusing on lessons from systems approaches to inflammation applied to multiple sclerosis. We suggest that employing systems biology methods in the design and execution of biomarker-supported, proof-of-principle clinical trials provides a singular opportunity to merge therapeutic development with a basic understanding of disease processes. The ultimate goal is to develop predictive computational models of the disease, which will revolutionize diagnostic process and provide mechanistic understanding necessary for personalized therapeutic approaches. Added, biologically meaningful information can be derived from diagnostic tests, if they are interpreted in functional relationships, rather than as independent measurements. Such systems biology based diagnostics will transform disease taxonomies from phenotypical to molecular and will allow physicians to select optimal therapeutic regimens for individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.