Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25018718›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

Neurorestorative therapy for stroke.

Jieli Chen, Poornima Venkat, Alex Zacharek, Michael Chopp

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The cellular model for Alzheimer's disease research: PC12 cells.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Abolishing UCHL1's hydrolase activity exacerbates ischemia-induced axonal injury and functional deficits in mice.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jieli ChenDepartment of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital , Detroit, MI , USA.
Poornima VenkatDepartment of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital , Detroit, MI , USA ; Department of Physics, Oakland University , Rochester, MI , USA.
Alex ZacharekDepartment of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital , Detroit, MI , USA.
Michael ChoppDepartment of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital , Detroit, MI , USA ; Department of Physics, Oakland University , Rochester, MI , USA.
Henry Ford Hospital · USOakland University · US

Funding

MSCs Induce Brain Plasticity via tPAR01AG037506 · NIA · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI CHOPP, MICHAEL · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic stroke is responsible for many deaths and long-term disability world wide. Development of effective therapy has been the target of intense research. Accumulating preclinical literature has shown that substantial functional improvement after stroke can be achieved using subacutely administered cell-based and pharmacological therapies. This review will discuss some of the latest findings on bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), human umbilical cord blood cells, and off-label use of some pharmacological agents, to promote recovery processes in the sub-acute and chronic phases following stroke. This review paper also focuses on molecular mechanisms underlying the cell-based and pharmacological restorative processes, which enhance angiogenesis, arteriogenesis, neurogenesis, and white matter remodeling following cerebral ischemia as well as an analysis of the interaction/coupling among these restorative events. In addition, the role of microRNAs mediating the intercellular communication between exogenously administered cells and parenchymal cells, and their effects on the regulation of angiogenesis and neuronal progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation, and brain plasticity after stroke are described.

Indexed as

BMSCHUCBCmicroRNAneurorestorationniaspan

Identifiers

PMID25018718
PMCPMC4072966
OpenAlexW1965637915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.